Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan;5(1):19–23.

Table 2.

The comparison between the present study and the Apaydin et al’s9 study.

Study Type of animal Sample size Type of tooth Mean area of cementum formation
Set Fresh
Apaydin et al’s 9 study Beagle dog 24 Mandibular premolar 32.83 μm2 49.54 μm2
Present study Persian cat 23 Maxilla and mandibular canine 158.7 μm2 308.3 μm2
*

One sample of fresh-MTA group was omitted during sample processing.