Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 15;48(11):3870–3875. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02464-09

TABLE 2.

Analytical sensitivities of influenza A/B and 2009 H1N1 RT-PCR assays

Specimen No. of specimens positive/total no. of specimens tested (%)
Influenza A/B assays (n = 150)
2009 H1N1 assays (n = 157)
CDC ProFlu+ MGB New H1N1 CDC SW Inf A CDC SW H1
Influenza A/H1 virusa 29/29 (100)b 27/29 (93.1) 27/29 (93.1) 0/22 0/22 0/22
Influenza A/H3 virusa 28/28 (100)c 28/28 (100) 28/28 (100) 0/15 0/15 0/15
Influenza A/2009 H1N1 virusd 30/30 (100) 30/30 (100) 26/30 (86.6) 100/100 (100) 99/100 (99) 97/100 (97)
Influenza B virus 30/30 (100) 30/30 (100) 29/30 (95)
Influenza virus negative 0/33 0/33 0/33 0/20 0/20 0/20
a

Influenza A/H1 and A/H3 subtypes were determined by CDC H1/H3-specific real-time PCR.

b

One rapid-antigen-positive influenza A/H1 specimen was negative by the R-Mix shell vial culture gold standard.

c

Two rapid-antigen-positive influenza A/H3 specimens were negative by the R-Mix shell vial culture gold standard.

d

Influenza A/H1N1 2009 strains used in this study were identified by the Luminex RVP assay as nonsubtypeable influenza A virus. The Luminex RVP assay was considered the gold standard for the 2009 H1N1 assays.