Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 31;88(1):33–40. doi: 10.1007/s00223-010-9423-7

Table 2.

Results from intravital fluochrome labeling

OVX OVX Vib Sham Sham Vib OVX vs. sham Vib vs. nonvib (both OVX and sham groups)
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD P P
Periosteal apposition
 Absolute apposition bandwidth (mcm)
  Calcein green (d0–d18) 9.49 2.33 10.26 4.29 8.65 1.26 8.77 2.08 >0.05 >0.05
  Alizarin red (d18–d24) 9.43 3.20 8.63 2.17 8.67 1.24 7.22 2.22 >0.05 >0.05
  Tetracycline (d24–d35) 13.51 5.28 14.84 3.79 13.15 2.21 14.27 3.77 >0.05 >0.05
  Sum 32.43 33.73 30.47 30.26
Endosteal apposition
 Absolute apposition bandwidth (mcm)
  Calcein green (d0–d18) No significant appositions No significant appositions 3.91 1.46 3.91 1.3 <0.05 >0.05
  Alizarin red (d18–d24) 3.93 1.055 4.11 1.32 <0.05 >0.05
  Tetracycline (d24–d35) 3.97 1.47 3.54 1.48 <0.05 >0.05
  Sum 11.81 11.56

The widths of apposition bands, calcein green, alizarin red, and tetracycline in cortical surface in subtrochanteric cross sections of rat femurs (15 mm distal from femoral head) were measured by fluorescence microscopy (400×). The P value of the difference between treated and untreated animals was calculated using a two-way ANOVA. P < 0.05 was considered significant. There are no interactions between OVX and vibration (Vib)