Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 28;122(2):327–340. doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1449-8

Table 2.

Comparison of QTL identified from this and previous studies of indica and japonica cultivars

Traits QTL of this study Previous studies
QTL Physical position (Mb)a QTLb Flanking markers Physical position (Mb) Population type Population size Mapping parentsc Reference
Heading date qHD-3 0.6–1.3 Hd9 R1468B-S12021 0.97–1.24 BC4F3 198 Nipponbare(J), Kasalath(I) Lin et al. (2002)
qHDD3-1 RG104-RG348 0.46–1.42 DH 125 Azucena(J), IR64(I) Hittalmani et al. (2003)
QHd3a C515-RG348a 0.69–1.42 RIL 254 Lemont(J), Teqing(I) Mei et al. (2005)
Culm diameter qCD-12 18.6–20 Unnamed G2140-R3375 5.60–18.86 BIL 98 Nipponbare(J), Kasalath(I) Kashiwagi and Ishimaru (2004)
Plant height qPH-1 40–40.6 Unnamed R494-C742 34.97–41.24 BC1F7 98 Nipponbare(J), Kasalath(I) Ishimaru et al. (2001)
QTLph1 C86-C742 39.47–42.71 BIL 98 Nipponbare(J), Kasalath(I) Ishimaru et al. (2001, 2004)
Unnamed R2414-C742 39.89–41.24 BIL 98 Nipponbare(J), Kasalath(I) Kashiwagi and Ishimaru (2004)
qPH-12 22.4–22.9 QPh12 G402-RG20q 21.25–25.39 RIL 254 Lemont(J), Teqing(I) Mei et al. (2005)
Flag leaf length qFLL-5 27.75–28.6 QFll5 RM480-RM334 27.45–28.62 RIL 180 IRAT109(J), Zhenshan 97(I) Yue et al. (2006)
Flag leaf width qFLW-4 31.3–31.8 QFlw4 RM255-RM349 31.35–33.08 RIL 180 IRAT109(J), Zhenshan 97(I) Yue et al. (2006)
Tiller angle qTA-9 21.3–21.7 Spk(t) C1263-C506 20.37–21.85 BIL 98 Nipponbare(J), Kasalath(I) Yamamoto et al. (1997)
qTA-9 C609-C506 19.24–21.85 CSSL 65 Asominori(J), IR24(I) Yu et al. (2005)
Panicle length qPL-6a 0.8–1.5 QPl6 RZ762-C76 0–1.82 RIL 254 Lemont(J), Teqing(I) Mei et al. (2005)
Grain length qGL-3 16.8–17.5 qGL-3a C80-C1677 16.19–18.36 RIL 71 Asominori(J), IR24(I) Wan et al. (2006)
Grain width qGW-2a 9–9.8 GW2 RM5897-RM2634 6.76–10.99 BC2F2 190 WY3(J), Fengaizhan-1(I) Song et al. (2007)
qGW-3 16.8–17.9 qGW-3 RM257-RM175 3.84–28.83 BIL 142 Nantehao(J), Balilla(I) Yan et al. (2003)
qGW-3 G332-C80 17.68–21.5 BIL 98 Nipponbare(J), Kasalath(I) Li et al. (2003)
qGW-5 5.1–5.5 qGW-5b C249-R566 1.83–7.74 BIL 98 Nipponbare(J), Kasalath(I) Li et al. (2003)
1,000-grain weight qTGW-5a 1.3–2.2 Unnamed R830-R3166 1.09–1.83 BIL 98 Nipponbare(J), Kasalath(I) Ishimaru K (2003)
qTGW-5b 27–27.4 Unnamed RM87-RM334 27.16–28.62 DH 190 WYJ2(J), Zhenshan 97(I) Jiang et al. (2004)
qTGW-10 11.7–11.9 Unnamed R2194-R2447 7.59–14.69 BIL 98 Nipponbare(J), Kasalath(I) Ishimaru K. (2003)
Spikelet number qSN-1a 3.5–4.4 Unnamed MRG167-RM84 3.94–4.23 DH 190 WYJ2(J), Zhenshan 97(I) Jiang et al. (2004)
qSN-1b 37.1–37.5 qSNP-1b OSR3-RM104 35.78–41.92 IL-LT 217 Lemont(J), Teqing(I) Mei et al. (2006)
qSN-6 10.9–13.1 QSn6 C235a-G294d 9.28–17.93 RIL 254 Lemont(J), Teqing(I) Mei et al. (2005)

aThe physical position of the bin corresponding to the 95% confidence interval for the detected QTL

bQTL identified in the previous studies of mapping population derived from crosses between indica and japonica cultivars. Those with flanking markers with known physical locations overlapping with the 95% confidence intervals of QTL found in this study are listed

cThe mapping parents of indica and japonica cultivars indicated by I and J, respectively