Table III.
Hierarchical Regressions: Parent Symptom Talk Predicting Child Symptom Complaints
Variable | R2 | ΔR2 | F | df | B | SE B | β |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Child catastrophizing | |||||||
Step 1 | .02 | .02 | .26 | 2, 30 | |||
Child gender | .05 | .03 | .21 | ||||
Child age | .01 | .01 | .07 | ||||
Step 2 | .54 | .52** | 8.20** | 4, 28 | |||
Parent symptom talk | .73 | .14 | .69** | ||||
Child catastrophizing | .01 | .02 | .10 | ||||
Step 3 | .61 | .07* | 8.42** | 5, 27 | |||
Interaction of parent symptom talk and child catastrophizing | .32 | .15 | .31* | ||||
Child pain threat appraisal | |||||||
Step 1 | .02 | .02 | .26 | 2, 30 | |||
Child gender | .05 | .03 | .18 | ||||
Child age | −.01 | .01 | −.03 | ||||
Step 2 | .54 | .52** | 8.32** | 4, 28 | |||
Parent symptom talk | .74 | .15 | .70** | ||||
Child pain threat appraisal | .03 | .03 | .12 | ||||
Step 3 | .56 | .02 | 6.95** | 5, 27 | |||
Interaction of parent symptom talk and Child pain threat appraisal | .35 | .32 | .17 |
Note. *p < .05. **p < .001. B, SE B, and β reflect values in the final step of the analyses.