Skip to main content
. 2010 May 19;36(1):55–63. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsq043

Table III.

Hierarchical Regressions: Parent Symptom Talk Predicting Child Symptom Complaints

Variable R2 ΔR2 F df B SE B β
Child catastrophizing
Step 1 .02 .02 .26 2, 30
    Child gender .05 .03 .21
    Child age .01 .01 .07
Step 2 .54 .52** 8.20** 4, 28
    Parent symptom talk .73 .14 .69**
    Child catastrophizing .01 .02 .10
Step 3 .61 .07* 8.42** 5, 27
    Interaction of parent symptom talk and child catastrophizing .32 .15 .31*
Child pain threat appraisal
Step 1 .02 .02 .26 2, 30
    Child gender .05 .03 .18
    Child age −.01 .01 −.03
Step 2 .54 .52** 8.32** 4, 28
    Parent symptom talk .74 .15 .70**
    Child pain threat appraisal .03 .03 .12
Step 3 .56 .02 6.95** 5, 27
    Interaction of parent symptom talk and Child pain threat appraisal .35 .32 .17

Note. *p < .05. **p < .001. B, SE B, and β reflect values in the final step of the analyses.