Skip to main content
. 2010 May 19;36(1):55–63. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsq043

Table IV.

Hierarchical Regressions: Parent Non-Symptom Talk Predicting Symptom Complaints

Variable R2 ΔR2 F df B SE B β
Child catastrophizing
Step 1 .02 .02 .26 2, 30
    Child gender .06 .04 .24
    Child age −.01 .01 −.11
Step 2 .43 .41** 5.23* 4, 28
    Parent non-symptom talk −.52 .13 −.64**
    Child catastrophizing .01 .02 .08
Step 3 .48 .05 4.95* 5, 27
    Interaction of parent non-symptom talk and child catastrophizing −.26 .16 −.28
Child pain threat appraisal
Step 1 .02 .02 .26 2, 30
    Child gender .06 .04 .24
    Child age −.02 .01 −.30*
Step 2 .43 .41** 5.30* 4, 28
    Parent non-symptom talk −.43 .12 −.53**
    Child pain threat appraisal .09 .04 .40*
Step 3 .55 .12* 6.60** 5, 27
    Interaction of parent non-symptom talk and Child pain threat appraisal −.75 .28 −.52*

Note. *p < .05. **p < .001. B, SE B, and β reflect values in the final step of the analyses.