Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 17.
Published in final edited form as: Postgrad Med. 2010 Jan;122(1):52–60. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2010.01.2099

Table 3.

Bivariate and Logistic Regression Analyses to Identify Factors Predictive of a Laboratory-Confirmed Chlamydia and/or Gonorrhea Infection

Bivariate Analyses
Logistic Regression Analyses
Number in
Each Group
Percentage
Infected with a
Chlamydia and/or
Gonorrhea
P Value LR for Chlamydia
and/or Gonorrhea
Infection
Univariable
Models
Multivariable
Model
Factor N % P < LR+ (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Age
 Age < 28 vs age > 28 years 414 vs 408 38.2 vs 20.1 0.001 1.50 (1.32–1.70)
 Age < 24 vs age > 24 yearsa 285 vs 537 40.4 vs 23.3 0.001 1.64 (1.37–1.97) 2.23 (1.64–3.04) 2.38 (1.69–3.35)
Race
 Non-white vs white 608 vs 213 30.6 vs 24.9 0.114 1.07 (0.99–1.17)
 Black or Hispanic vs white or
 unknown/othera
520 vs 301 31.7 vs 24.6 0.030 1.13 (1.02–1.26) 1.43 (1.03–1.97) 1.21 (0.85–1.72)
Insurance status
 No insurance vs any insurancea 384 vs 438 32.9 vs 25.0 0.013 1.19 (1.04–1.35) 1.47 (1.08–1.99) 1.58 (1.13–2.20)
 Private vs all others 201 vs 621 30.9 vs 28.7 0.554 1.08 (0.84–1.40)
Symptoms
 Any symptoms vs no symptoms 729 vs 93 29.9 vs 23.7 0.212 1.03 (0.98–1.09)
 Any discharge vs no dischargea 506 vs 316 40.1 vs 11.7 0.001 1.62 (1.48–1.79) 5.05 (3.43–7.43) 6.45 (4.24–9.81)
 Dysuria or discharge vs no dysuria
 or discharge
689 vs 133 31.2 vs 18.8 0.004 1.10 (1.04–1.17)
History of a known STD contact
 Any STD contact vs no/not stated
 STD contacts
203 vs 619 31.5 vs 28.4 0.400 1.12 (0.87–1.44)
 Any chlamydia and/or gonorrhea
 contact vs other or none/not stated
 contactsa
92 vs 730 39.1 vs 27.9 0.026 1.56 (1.05–2.30) 1.66 (1.06–2.60) 2.41 (1.43–4.06)
a

Indicates variables selected for the subsequent model-building process.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; LR, likelihood ratio; OR, odds ratio; STD, sexually transmitted diseases.