Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 25;50(2):261–270. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq285

Table 2.

ACR response rates (%) at study end in RAPID 1 (Week 52), RAPID 2 (Week 24) and FAST4WARD (Week 24) [4–6]

Study ACR20 ACR50 ACR70
RAPID 1a,b
 Placebo + MTX Q2 W (n = 199) 13.6 7.6 3.5
 CZP 200 mg + MTX Q2 W (n = 393) 53.1, P < 0.001 38.0, P < 0.001 21.2, P < 0.001
 CZP 400 mg + MTX Q2 W (n = 390) 54.9, P < 0.001 39.9, P < 0.001 23.2, P < 0.001
RAPID 2a,b
 Placebo + MTX Q2 W (n = 127) 8.7 3.1 0.8
 CZP 200 mg + MTX Q2 W (n = 246) 57.3, P < 0.001 32.5, P < 0.001 15.9, P ≤ 0.01
 CZP 400 mg + MTX Q2 W (n = 246) 57.6, P < 0.001 33.1, P < 0.001 10.6, P ≤ 0.01
FAST4WARDc,d
 Placebo Q4 W (n = 109) 9.3 3.7 0
 CZP 400 mg Q4 W (n = 111) 45.5, P < 0.001 22.7, P < 0.001 5.5, P ≤ 0.05

aITT population: analyses performed using non-responder imputation. bDosing every 2 weeks (Q2 W). cModified ITT population: analyses performed using non-responder imputation. dDosing every 4 weeks (Q4 W). P-values vs placebo plus MTX or placebo alone. ACR20/ACR50/ACR70 responses for the CZP and placebo groups were compared using logistic regression with treatment and geographical region as factors in the RAPID trials or a Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test stratified by country in the FAST4WARD trial. Details of the statistical analyses are provided in the primary publications for the trials [4–6]. ITT: intention-to-treat.