Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurolinguistics. 2007 Jan;20(1):50–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.04.001

Table 1.

Reliabilities of voice acoustic measures and correlations with Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) severity.

VA measure Reliabilityb HAMD Associationc p
F0 COVa .61 -.01 ns
F1 COVa .24 -.03 ns
F2 COVa -.02 -.17 < .05
Total recording length of speech sample .57 .20 < .01
Total vocalization time .66 .07 ns
Total pause time .71 .29 < .001
Number of pauses .71 .10 ns
Pause variability (St. Dev.) .64 .38 < .001
Percent pause time .04 .18 < .01
Vocalization/pause ratio .48 -.22 = .001
Speaking rate (syllables/sec) .65 -.23 < .001
a

Coefficient of Variation

b

Cronbach’s alpha, assessed across speech tasks within each telephone call

c

Pearson’s correlation