Table 2.
Class and/or Antimicrobial | Range tested (μg/mL) | Resistance breakpoint (μg/mL) | All (n = 221) | Avian (n = 25) | Bovine (n = 123) | Equine (n = 21) | Porcine (n = 22) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amoxicillin/Clavulanate | 2–16 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
MIC50a | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
Ampicillin/Sulbactam | 4–64 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
MIC50a | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||
Cephalothin | 4–64 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
MIC50a | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||
Penicillin | 0.06–0.5 | 0.25 | 31 | 20 | 26 | 43 | 100b |
MIC50 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 1 | |||
MIC90 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | |||
Ciprofloxacin | 0.25–16 | 4 | < 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0c |
MIC50 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | |||
MIC90 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |||
Enrofloxacin | 0.25–16 | 4 | < 1 | 0 | 0 | 0c | 0 |
MIC50 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | |||
MIC90 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.25 | |||
Clindamycin | 0.25–16 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 64b |
MIC50a | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 16 | |||
Erythromycin | 0.25–16 | 8 | 8 | 4d | 0 | 5 | 68b |
MIC50a | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 32 | |||
Amikacin | 8–64 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
MIC50a | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |||
Gentamicin | 2–16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
MIC50a | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
Chloramphenicol | 4–32 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0c |
MIC50 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8 | |||
MIC90 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |||
Rifampin | 0.5–8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
MIC50a | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |||
Tetracycline | 2–32 | 16 | 12 | 24d | 1 | 10 | 82b |
MIC50 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 32 | |||
MIC90 | 64 | 2 | 2 | 64 | |||
Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole | 19–76 | 76 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
MIC50a | 19 | 19 | 19 | 19 |
The MIC90 values were identical to the MIC50.
Significantly higher MICs (P < 0.008) than avian, bovine, and equine isolates.
Significantly higher MICs (P < 0.008) than avian and bovine isolates.
Significantly higher MICs (P < 0.008) than bovine isolates.