Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 18;8(1):e1000387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000387

Table 1. Critical appraisal of “reviews” (see legend for description of quality assessment criteria).

Lead Author and Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Totala
Ammenwerth 2008 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 24
Anderson 1997 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 23
Balas 2004 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 22
Bennett 2003 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 18
Bryan 2008 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19
Charvet-Protat 1998 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 12
Chatellier 1998 2 2 2 0 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 21
Chaudhry 2006 1 1 2 2 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 2 0 2 2 18
Clamp 2005 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 17
Delpierre 2004 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 13
Dexheimer 2008 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 0 0 19
Durieux 2008 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 23
Eslami 2007 2 2 1 1 0 1 2 2 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 18
Eslami 2008 2 2 1 1 0 1 2 2 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 18
Eslami 2009 2 2 1 0 1 2 2 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 1 16
Fitzmaurice 1998 2 1 0 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 12
Garg 2005 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 20
Georgiou 2007 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 2 1 21
Hayward 2009 2 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 2 1 0 2 1 1 1 15
Hender 2000 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11
Heselmans 2009 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 22
Hider 2002 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 21
Irani 2009 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 18
Jamal 2009 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 16
Jerant 2000 1 2 0 0 2 1 1 1 2 1 0 2 1 1 1 16
Kaushal 2003 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 16
Mador 2009 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 20
Mitchell 2001 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 17
Montgomery 1998 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 14
Niazkhani 2009 2 2 2 1 0 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 22
Oren 2003 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 2 14
Pearson 2009 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 23
Poissant 2005 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 25
Randell 2007 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 17
Reckmann 2009 2 2 1 2 0 2 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 2 2 20
Rothschild 2004 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 2 1 0 2 1 1 1 16
Schedlbauer 2009 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 22
Shachak 2009 2 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 15
Shamliyan 2008 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 13
Shebl 2007 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 17
Shekelle 2006 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 20
Shekelle 2009 1 1 2 1 0 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 21
Shiffman 1999 1 1 2 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 14
Shojania 2009 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 22
Sintchenko 2007 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 17
Smith 2007 1 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 2 1 17
Tan 2005 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 19
Thompson 2009 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 9
Uslu 2008 2 1 0 0 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 16
van Rosse 2009 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 0 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 24
Wolfstadt 2008 1 1 0 0 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 13
Wong 2010 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 22
Yourman 2008 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 16
Average scores 1.49 1.47 1.3 1.09 1.19 1.28 1.45 1.19 1.43 1.21 0.7 1.32 0.87 1.08 0.91 18

Maximum total score of 30, each question (or Q) having a maximum of 2 points, refer to Table S1 for the critical appraisal form for additional details.