Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 19;103(2):129–142. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq455

Table 1.

Published reports on diagnostic test characteristics of ultrasonography (US) and computed-tomography (CT) for staging and surveillance testing in patients with melanoma*

Imaging modality, first author, and year (reference) Study design No. of patients Sensitivity, % (95% CI) Specificity, % (95% CI) Accuracy, % (95% CI) Prevalence, %
US of regional lymph nodes
    Prayer, 1990 (43) Retrospective 217 100 (86 to 100) 97 (93 to 99) 97 (94 to 99) 13
    Tregnaghi, 1997 (44) Retrospective 87 87 (61 to 97) 95 (86 to 98) 93 (86 to 97) NA
    Binder, 1997 (45) Retrospective 264 90 (78 to 96) 99 (98 to 99) 99 (98 to 99) 19
    Uren, 1999 (46) Prospective 52 94 (NA) 87 (NA) 89 (NA) NA
    Voit, 2001 (47) Prospective 829 99 (97 to 100) 98 (98 to 99) 98 (98 to 99) NA
    Rossi, 2000 (48) Retrospective 69 33 (15 to 59) 100 (92 to 100) 87 (77 to 93) 11
    Garbe, 2003 (28) Prospective 2008 86 (79 to 90) 99 (98 to 99) 98 (98 to 98) 6
    Brountzos, 2003 (49) Prospective 148 98 (87 to 100) 98 (93 to 100) 98 (94 to 100) 30
    Schmid-Wendtner, 2003 (50) Prospective 1395 92 (86 to 96) 98 (98 to 99) 98 (97 to 98) 8
    Hafner, 2004 (51) Prospective 100 8 (1 to 25) 88 (78 to 94) 67 (57 to 75) 26
    Hocevar, 2004 (52) Retrospective 57 71 (45 to 88) 84 (70 to 92) 81 (68 to 89) 25
    Machet, 2005 (53) Retrospective 361 93 (80 to 98) 98 (95 to 99) 97 (95 to 99) 12
    Starritt, 2005 (54) Prospective 304 23 (11 to 40) 100 (98 to 100) 92 (88 to 95) 11
    Testori, 2005 (55) Prospective 88 94 (71 to 100) 90 (82 to 95) 91 (83 to 95) NA
    Voit, 2006 (56) Prospective 127 79 (63 to 90) 72 (62 to 81) 74 (66 to 81) 28
    Dalle, 2006 (57) Prospective 67 98 (90 to 100) 96 (86 to 100) 97 (92 to 99) 48
    Sibon, 2007 (58) Prospective 131 21 (10 to 37) 90 (82 to 94) 26 (64 to 79) 27
    Schmid-Wendtner, 2004 (59) Prospective 22 80 (48 to 95) 79 (52 to 93) 26 (59 to 91) NA
    Rossi, 2003 (60)§ Prospective 125 33 (15 to 59) 100 (92 to 100) 87 (77 to 93) 22
    Van Rijk, 2006 (61)§ Prospective 107 5 (1 to 19) 99 (91 to 100) 66 (57 to 75) 35
    Schafer-Hesterberg, 2007 (62)§ Prospective 400 65 (54 to 74) 99 (97 to 100) 92 (89 to 94) 20
    Voit, 2006 (56)§ Prospective 127 59 (42 to 74) 100 (94 to 100) 88 (80 to 93) 28
CT
    All lesions
        Buzaid, 1993 (63) Retrospective 151 100 (29 to 100) 82 (75 to 87) 82 (75 to 87) 1
        Buzaid, 1995 (64) Retrospective 89 100 (55 to 100) 76 (66 to 84) 77 (68 to 85) 7
        Kuvshinoff, 1997 (65) Retrospective 136 57 (NA) NA NA NA
        Holder, 1998 (66) Prospective 76 55 (41 to 69) 84 (71 to 92) 70 (59 to 78) NA
        Swetter, 2002 (67) Retrospective 104 58 (49 to 66) 70 (52 to 83) 60 (53 to 67) 39
        Finkelstein, 2004 (68) Prospective 18 75 (62 to 85) 87 (73 to 94) 81 (72 to 88) NA
        Romer, 2006 (69) Retrospective 34 88 (79 to 93) 95 (93 to 96) 94 (92 to 95) NA
        Brady, 2006 (70) Prospective 103 48 (34 to 62) 95 (85 to 99) 75 (66 to 82) 43
        Pfannenberg, 2007 (71) Prospective 64 77 (72 to 82) 70 (61 to 77) 75 (71 to 79) 61
        Iagaru, 2007 (72) Retrospective 106 69 (55 to 79) 94 (83 to 98) 80 (71 to 87) 53
    Lymph node metastases
        Fuster, 2004(73) Retrospective 115 56 (39 to 71) 81 (69 to 89) 72 (62 to 80) NA
        Reinhardt, 2006 (74) Retrospective 250 85 (75 to 91) 87 (81 to 91) 86 (82 to 90) 31
        Veit-Haibach 2009 (75) Prospective 74 23 (8 to 51) 100 (90 to 100) 82 (70 to 90) 23
    Distant metastases
        Fuster, 2004 (73) Retrospective 115 74 (61 to 83) 83 (79 to 87) 82 (78 to 85) NA
        Reinhardt, 2006 (74) Retrospective 250 74 (63 to 82) 88 (82 to 92) 83 (78 to 87) 34
        Veit-Haibach 2009 (75) Prospective 74 25 (9 to 54) 93 (81 to 98) 79 (66 to 87) 21
*

Prevalence is the number of patients with disease divided by the total number of patients in the 2 × 2 table. The number of patients excludes the patients who were not used to calculate sensitivity and specificity. CI = confidence interval; NA = not available.

This study was not included in the statistical models because of missing data on true-positive, false-positive, false-negative, and true-negative results.

Color Doppler sonography was used in this study.

§

Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology was used in this study.

These studies provided detailed results on different levels of lesions.