Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 5;9:5. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-5

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of different prognostic factors in 123 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (Cox Proportional Hazards Regression)

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Variable All cases HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value

Age (years) 0.883
 ≤47.9a 59 1.0
 >47.9 64 1.044 (0.588-1.853)
Sex 0.746
 Male 107 1.153 (0.489-2.717)
 Female 16 1.0
Hepatitis history 0.806
 Yes 105 0.904 (0.405-2.021)
 No 18 1.0
AFP (ng/ml) 0.000 0.014
 ≤20 68 1.0 1.0
 >20 55 5.445 (2.852-10.395) 2.573 (1.209-5.476)
Liver cirrhosis 0.807
 Yes 87 1.0
 No 36 1.082 (0.578-2.026)
Tumor size (cm) 0.000 0.167
 ≤5 76 1.0 1.0
 >5 47 2.946 (1.640-5.290) 1.595 (0.823-3.090)
Tumor multiplicity 0.000 0.077
 Single 85 1.0 1.0
 Multiple 38 3.768 (2.108-6.735) 1.790 (0.939-3.414)
Differentiation 0. 099
 Well-moderate 85 1.0
 Poor-undifferentiated 38 1.642 (0.911-2.958)
Stage 0.000 0.363
 I-II 61 1.0 1.0
 III -IV 62 5.828 (2.722-12.480) 1.571 (0.593-4.162)
Vascular invasion 0.000 0.015
 Yes 55 5.372 (2.724-10.595) 2.724 (1.214-6.113)
 No 68 1.0 1.0
Relapse 0.000 0.321
 Yes 42 2.885 (1.608-5.174) 1.390 (0.725-2.666)
 No 81 1.0 1.0
p300 0.001 0.021
 Low expression 63 1.0 1.0
 High expression 60 2.792 (1.533-5.087) 2.077 (1.149-4.112)
Ki67 0.089
 Low expression 68 1.0
 High expression 50 1.661 (0.925-2.982)

aMean age; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; HR, hazards ratio; CI, confidence interval.