Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 19;11:713. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-713

Table 3.

Summary of all QTL pairs detected using pair-wise scans in the F2 mice.

QTL 1 QTL 2 LOD %
Trait Chr Best location (cM) Closest marker to peak LOD Chr Best location (cM) Closest marker to peak LOD Full Add Int

Glu 12 wk 15 53.7 D15Mit2 19 27 D19Mit30 10.4 3.6 6.8 8.5
5 36 D5Mit80 7 28.7 D7Mit231 9.3 2.9 6.4 6.5
12 53 D12Mit233 19 28 D19Mit30 9.3 2.8 6.5 5.8

Tg 16 wk 3 21.6 D3Mit304 13 38 D13Mit26 12.3 2.1 10.2 4.8

Tg 20 wk 7 79.7 D7Mit109 14 59.5 D14Mit102 11.7 1.3 10.4 4.8
10 24 D10Mit130 17 75 D17Mit123 10.8 2.8 8.1 5.0
5 99 D5Mit101 16 51.3 D16Mit152 11.1 0.9 10.2 3.1

Chol 8 wk 5 33 D5Mit80 17 30 D17Mit54 12.9 2.1 10.8 4.8
5 107 D5Mit101 14 57.5 D14Mit107 9.3 1.9 7.4 4.0

Chol 24 wk 1 68.7 D1Mit26 10 50 D10Mit11 13.4 5.8 7.6 7.5
15 45.7 D5Mit2 16 57.3 D16Mit152 10.5 2.0 8.6 4.2
4 14.3 D4Mit97 5 98 D5Mit101 13.6 1.8 11.8 3.7

IG FPW 7 82.7 D7Mit109 8 52 D8Mit242 9.9 3.0 6.9 3.7

Sum FPW 7 71.7 D7Mit109 17 76 D17Mit123 9.8 2.7 7.1 3.9

Chr, chromosome; Full, the Lod score for the full model (including additive effects and interaction); Add, the Lod score for two locus additive effects; Int, the Lod score for the interaction (Full - Add); %, total variance explained by R-square; Glu, glucose; Tg, trighlyceride; Chol, cholesterol; IG FPW, inguinal fat pad weight; Sum FPW, sum of the 5 regional fat pad weights; wk, week.