Table 3. Small mammals trapped in the different sites, number and % of positivesa.
| Area | Md | +/% | Of | +/% | Od | +/% | St | +/% | Aa | +/% | No | +/% | Hb | +/% | Cl | +/% | Mm | +/% | Rr | +/% | Ca | +/% | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PV |
- |
-/- |
38 |
1/2.6 |
- |
-/- |
- |
-/- |
10 |
0/0 |
- |
-/- |
- |
-/- |
2 |
0/0 |
81 |
0/0 |
- |
-/- |
- |
-/- |
131 |
|
| Ce |
- |
-/- |
47 |
1/2.1 |
9 |
0/0 |
52 |
0/0 |
4 |
0/0 |
17 |
0/0 |
2 |
0/0 |
- |
-/- |
23 |
0/0 |
- |
-/- |
- |
-/- |
153 |
|
| Me |
- |
-/- |
67 |
2/2.9 |
8 |
0/0 |
37 |
0/0 |
- |
-/- |
17 |
0/0 |
- |
-/- |
1 |
0/0 |
10 |
0/0 |
- |
-/- |
3 |
0/0 |
297 |
|
| Pi |
- |
-/- |
4 |
0/0 |
- |
-/- |
8 |
0/0 |
14 |
0/0 |
- |
-/- |
- |
-/- |
- |
-/- |
2 |
0/0 |
- |
-/- |
- |
-/- |
28 |
|
| Sa |
3 |
0/0 |
42 |
1/2.4 |
1 |
0/0 |
92 |
0/0 |
5 |
0/0 |
18 |
0/0 |
- |
-/- |
- |
-/- |
12 |
0/0 |
- |
-/- |
- |
-/- |
173 |
|
| Ca |
1 |
0/0 |
- |
-/- |
- |
-/- |
9 |
0/0 |
1 |
0/0 |
- |
-/- |
- |
-/- |
- |
-/- |
29 |
0/0 |
2 |
0/0 |
1 |
0/0 |
43 |
|
| Total | 4 | 0/0 | 194 | 5/2.6 | 22 | 0/0 | 198 | 0/0 | 34 | 0/0 | 52 | 0/0 | 2 | 0/0 | 3 | 0/0 | 157 | 0/0 | 2 | 0/0 | 4 | 0/0 | 672 | |
aMd, Monodelphis dimidiate; Of, Oligoryzomys flavescens; Od, O. delticola; St, Scapteromys tumidus, Aa, Akodon azarae, No, Necromys obscurus; Hb, Holochilus brasiliensis; Cl, Calomys laucha; Mm, Mus musculus; Rr ,Rattus rattus; Ca, Cavia aperea; PV, Puntas de Valdéz; Ce, Cerrillos; Me, Melilla; Pi, Piedritas, Sa, Sauce; Ca, Canelones. O. flavescens, S. tumidus, and M. musculus were the most frequently captured rodents.