Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Theory Comput. 2010 Nov 9;6(12):3735–3749. doi: 10.1021/ct100398m

Table 5.

The comparison of the isomer shifts and the quadrupole splittings of MMOH reduced (Re) structure as well as the peroxo and Q intermediates computed in this work and in the works of Han and Noodleman.3,29 Our geometries were optimized by QM/MM62 whereas those in Refs.3,29 were produced by the DFT in continuous dielectric medium (the so-called COSMO model). The juxtaposition of the coordinations is approximate since the geometries in the same row do not exactly coincide. For the schematic geometries of the QM/MM optimized intermediates see Fig. 4. The IS and QS values of this work are computed with the methods that give the most accurate statistics – B3LYP/Partridge-1 and O3LYP/Partridge-1, respectively. The Mossbauer characteristics corresponding to the geometries of Han and Noodleman were taken from their works.3,29

This work Refs.3,29 Experiment
Form δ |QS| δ |QS| δ |QS|
Re 1.27
1.16
3.00
2.46
1.26
1.34
2.87
3.00
1.3
1.3
2.87; 3.1
2.87; 2.4–3.0
P-1 (μ-η2,η1) 0.62
0.78
1.03
0.44


0.66
0.66
1.51
1.51
P-2 (μ-η2,η2) 0.57
0.63
0.77
1.15
0.60
0.57
0.57
0.97
0.66
0.66
1.51
1.51
P-3 (A-μ-1,2) 0.73
0.70
1.60
1.25
0.72
0.63
1.69
1.12
0.66
0.66
1.51
1.51
P-4 (S-μ-1,2) 0.57
0.58
1.86
1.31
0.64
0.61
1.81
1.21
0.66
0.66
1.51
.1.51
Q 0.11
0.38
0.78
0.69
0.18
0.22
0.33
0.33
0.17, 0.21
0.17, 0.14
0.53, 0.68
0.53, 0.55