Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aging Cell. 2010 Oct;9(5):823–836. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2010.00612.x

Table 5.

Evidence for the 21 candidate genes at the Chr 10 locus

Gene Mb* Gene expression difference
MRL vs SM
Fold change (P value)
Expression QTL analysis Non-synonymous
polymorphism


Female Male LOD score High allele
Btbd11 84.9 −1.01 (0.940) −1.21 (0.040) - - -
Syn3 85.7 +1.21 (0.003) +1.03 (0.550) - - -
Timp3 85.7 −1.41 (0.004) −1.25 (0.044) 18.1 SM -
Stab2 86.3 +1.12 (0.201) +1.17 (0.082) 53.2 MRL -
1700113H08Rik 86.6 +1.15 (0.437) −1.15 (0.439) - - -
Ascl1 86.9 +1.17 (0.089) −1.06 (0.508) - - -
Pah 87.0 −1.09 (0.001) −1.19 (0.056) 6.8 SM -
Igf1 87.3 +1.39 (0.002) +1.19 (0.072) - - -
Pmch 87.5 +1.16 (0.151) +1.00 (0.962) - - -
4930547N16Rik 87.5 −1.04 (0.538) −1.08 (0.229) - - E152A
Nup37 87.6 −1.17 (0.007) +1.03 (0.543) - - -
Ccdc53 87.6 −1.05 (0.567) +1.14 (0.188) - - -
Spic 88.1 −1.07 (0.581) +1.11 (0.410) - - -
EG237433 88.1 +1.07 (0.583) −1.15 (0.280) - - -
Arl1 88.1 +1.02 (0.723) −1.13 (0.052) - - -
Utp20 88.2 −1.22 (0.032) +1.10 (0.275) - - -
Slc5a8 88.3 +1.10 (0.110) −1.18 (0.016) - - -
Tmem16d 88.5 +1.13 (0.125) +1.02 (0.760) - - -
Gas2l3 88.8 +1.03 (0.665) +1.21 (0.665) - - -
Nr1h4 88.9 −1.19 (0.005) +1.10 (0.085) - - E28D, K199R
Slc17a8 89.0 −2.52 (<0.001) −2.11 (<0.001) 50.4 SM -
*

Build 37.

Fold changes are given as MRL mice compared to SM mice in males and females separately. P values were calculated by ANOVA analysis and are indicated in parentheses for the transcripts. Some of the genes have more than one transcript. We report here the most significant transcript. All other transcripts are indicated in Table S6, Supporting Information. Numbers in bold indicate significant difference between MRL and SM (P < 0.05).

Results from QTL analysis for Chr 10 using the expression level of the transcript as the phenotype. The LOD score of the Chr 10 peak is indicated.