Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eval Program Plann. 2010 Sep 29;34(2):124–134. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.09.001

Table 2.

Proposition 36 participant characteristics at treatment entry during fiscal year 2006–07

County size Large Medium
County 1 2 3 Range (n=13a) 4 5 6 Range (n=12a)
No. Proposition 36 participants 1,083 710 863 403–9,675 1,366 125 718 125–1,378
Age, Mean 36 35 37 34–40 36 39 32 32–39
Female, % 29 23 25 19–30 27 20 34 20–34
Race/ethnicity, %
 White 39 47 40 22–53 41 71 41 29–80
 Hispanic 23 19 28 18–47 32 10 51 10–51
 African American 27 27 17 3–46 19 18 5 <1–26
 Asian/Pacific Islander 6 3 9 <1–9 5 0 1 0–6
 Native American 2 1 1 <1–2 1 0 2 0–4
 Other 4 3 6 2–9 2 <1 <1 0–5
Referral type, %
 Probation 92 82 90 68–96 90 96 95 66–97
 Parole 8 18 10 4–32 10 4 5 3–36
Employed, % 36 25 38 24–45 20 34 28 19–45
Primary drug type, %
 Methamphetamine 50 50 48 21–76 54 34 64 34–71
 Cocaine 18 15 18 6–35 11 25 10 3–25
 Marijuana 13 18 15 5–18 14 9 14 4–17
 Heroin 12 6 5 3–16 15 12 6 4–24
 Alcohol 7 11 13 5–13 5 20 5 2–20
 Other 1 1 1 <1–3 1 0 <1 0–3
Prior drug treatment, % 43 47 68 37–69 42 56 55 <1–74
a

Indicates total number of counties within this size category.