Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eval Program Plann. 2010 Sep 29;34(2):124–134. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.09.001

Table 3.

Indicators of Proposition 36 program performance and outcomes

County size Large Medium
County 1 2 3 Range (n=13a) 4 5 6 Range (n=12a)
Dropped-out of treatment <30 days, %b 25 19 32 19–49 27 36 21 21–55
Treatment retention ≤ 90 days, % 53 63 49 42–63 44 45 64 26–64
Completed treatment, % 24 50 45 24–62 28 66 51 28–66
Re-arrested for drug offense, %b 49 50 43 30–59 44 53 42 39–62
Re-arrested for any offense, %b 69 73 70 51–79 73 69 68 61–79
Sentenced to jail, %b 54 57 49 36–96 24 52 48 24–93
Sentenced to prison, %b 6 4 5 1–17 10 4 9 4–14
Composite scorec 35 38 35 28–38 35 36 40 29–40
a

Indicates total number of counties within this size category.

b

Indicates item was reverse-scored for calculation of the composite score.

c

Sum of seven indicators; possible range 0 to 70.