Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dermatol Surg. 2010 Jul;36(7):1087–1098. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01589.x

Table 1.

Comparison of photographic approaches

1999-2004a 2004-2009b
Photographic approach Serial DELM photography TB photography
Time for initial visit (clinical
exam and photography)
30-50 min 20-30 min
Time for follow-up visit (exam
and photo comparison)
30-50 min 10-20 min
Patients with ≥1 follow-up visit 297 467
Monitoring period 3-52 (median 22) months 2-54 (median 24) months
Biopsies on follow-up visits 324 (1.1 per patient) 275 (0.59 per patient), p<.001
Melanomas on follow-up visits 6 (2 MIS, 4 invasive)
0.020 per patient
12 (7 MIS, 5 invasive)
0.026 per patient, p=.81
odds ratio 0.81 (0.24-2.28)c
Melanoma detection rate on
follow-up visits
1.9%
(nevus : melanoma ratio = 53)
2.2%d
(nevus : melanoma ratio = 45)d
4.4%, p=.093
odds ratio 2.41 (0.82-7.95)c
(nevus : melanoma ratio = 22)
5.5%, p=.088d
odds ratio 2.57 (0.88-8.51)d
(nevus : melanoma ratio = 17)d
Depth of invasive melanomas
on follow-up visits
0.23-0.35 mm 0.19-0.65 mm
Derivation of melanomas on
follow-up visits
1/6 nevus-derived
(1 DN)
3/12 nevus-derived, p=1.0
odds ratio 1.61 (0.096-100)c
(1 CN, 2 DN)
a

As described in Fuller et al.16

b

Present study.

c

Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) computed with second odds (present study) in numerator.

d

Excluding lesions biopsied without photographic change.