Skip to main content
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 2010 Sep 17;39(2):475–485. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq818

Tonicity-responsive microRNAs contribute to the maximal induction of osmoregulatory transcription factor OREBP in response to high-NaCl hypertonicity

Weifeng Huang 1, Huili Liu 1, Tao Wang 1, Tiantian Zhang 1, Juntao Kuang 1, Yu Luo 2, Stephen S M Chung 3, Li Yuan 1, James Y Yang 1,*
PMCID: PMC3025551  PMID: 20852262

Abstract

Osmotic response element binding protein (OREBP) is a Rel-like transcription factor critical for cellular osmoresponses. Previous studies suggest that hypertonicity-induced accumulation of OREBP protein might be mediated by transcription activation as well as posttranscriptional mRNA stabilization or increased translation. However, the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely elucidated. Here, we report that microRNAs (miRNAs) play critical regulatory roles in hypertonicity-induced induction of OREBP. In renal medullary epithelial mIMCD3 cells, hypertonicity greatly stimulates the activity of the 3′-untranslated region of OREBP (OREBP-3′UTR). Furthermore, overexpression of OREBP-3′UTR or depletion of miRNAs by knocking-down Dicer greatly increases OREBP protein expression. On the other hand, significant alterations in miRNA expression occur rapidly in response to high NaCl exposure, with miR-200b and miR-717 being most significantly down-regulated. Moreover, increased miR-200b or miR-717 causes significant down-regulation of mRNA, protein and transcription activity of OREBP, whereas inhibition of miRNAs or disruption of the miRNA–3′UTR interactions abrogates the silencing effects. In vivo in mouse renal medulla, miR-200b and miR-717 are found to function to tune OREBP in response to renal tonicity alterations. Together, our results support the notion that miRNAs contribute to the maximal induction of OREBP to participate in cellular responses to osmotic stress in mammalian renal cells.

INTRODUCTION

Osmotic response element binding protein (OREBP), also called tonicity-responsive element binding protein (TonEBP) or nuclear factor of the activated T cells-5 (NFAT5), is a Rel-like transcription factor that serves as a master regulator for cellular osmoregulation in the kidney and in T lymphocytes (1–4). Recent studies indicate that it also controls a number of other processes such as embryogenesis (5), cancer invasion (6), HIV replication (7) and myogenesis (8). It is established that the p38 MAPK pathway transduces the environmental signals to activate the transcription of OREBP (9–11). The transcription activation is followed by several posttranscriptional mechanisms, which include stabilization of mRNA and increased protein synthesis (12,13), protein phosphorylation (9,14–16) and nuclear localization (17–19), to maximally up-regulate OREBP activity. High NaCl has been shown to be capable of increasing the stability of OREBP mRNA and its translation (12–14), indicating that these levels of regulation are of great importance in the induction of OREBP. The underlying mechanisms and the regulators involved in these posttranscriptional regulations, however, have remained unclear.

miRNAs are noncoding small RNAs that serve as important regulators of gene expression by targeting the 3′-UTR of mRNA to induce mRNA cleavage and/or translational repression (20,21). Emerging data show that miRNAs are implicated in cellular response to various types of stresses including oxidative stress, radiation and UV and serum or nutrient deprivation (22,23). Recently, it has been demonstrated that the miR-8 family miRNAs are important for osmoresponses in embryonic zebrafish. In particular, miR-200b was found to be involved in osmoregulation in the inocytes cells through targeting Na/H exchange regulatory factor-1 (Nherf1), a regulator of apical trafficking of transmembrane ion transporter (24). Because zebrafish inocytes are believed to be functionally equivalent to the renal intercalated cells in the mammalian kidney nephron and the collecting tubules, the findings from zebrafish raised an important question of whether similar systems function in osmoregulation in the mammalian cells and the kidneys. In our current investigation, we found that miRNA-mediated gene silencing plays important roles in the regulation of OREBP expression in mouse renal cells and kidneys. We demonstrated that miR-200b and miR-717 are highly tonicity sensitive and able to function to regulate the stability of OREBP mRNA and the accumulation of OREBP protein in vitro and in vivo. Together, our results suggest that these two miRNAs are important endogenous regulators of osmoregulation and osmoadaptation in mammals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasmid construction

Chimeric OREBP-3′UTR-luciferase reporter plasmids and a chimeric aldose reductase (AR) promoter-luciferase reporter plasmid (pAR-ORE-luc) were prepared as described in Supplementary Figure S1 and Supplementary Table S1. miRNA overexpression plasmids were generated as described in Supplementary Table S2.

Cell culture, tonicity treatments and transient transfections

Mouse collecting duct epithelial mIMCD3 cells were obtained from ATCC and normally cultured in isotonic medium (300 mOsmol/kg H2O) as described (12). Plasmid DNA, small interfering RNAs (siRNA) and miRNA mimics and miRNA inhibitor (anti-sense oligonucleotides) transfections were performed with Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. For hypertonic treatment, hypertonic medium was prepared by adding NaCl to the isotonic medium to adjust the osmolarity to the level of 550 mOsmol/kg H2O. Following transfections and/or tonicity treatments, cells were harvested at specified time points for analyses.

For transient miRNA precursor and miRNA-inhibitor transfections, mIMCD3 cells were co-transfected with either phOREBP-3′UTR-luc or pOREBP-3′UTR-luc-1 or pOREBP-3′UTR-luc-2 and pSV40-β-galactosidase (3:1), together with 30 nM miRNA precursor or 30 nM of inhibitor or controls under isotonic condition and grown for 24 h. miRNA precursors are custom-prepared RNAs and the inhibitors are anti-sense oligonucleotides (Supplementary Table S3).

For miRNA overexpression, cells were co-transfected with a miRNA-overexpressing plasmid, a luciferase reporter plasmid (pOREBP-3′UTR-luc-1 or pOREBP-3′UTR-luc-2 or pAR-ORE-luc) together with pSV40-β-galactosidase (4:3:1) under isotonic condition and grown for 24 h. For miRNA recognition element (MRE) site-mutant transfection, cells were co-transfected with one of the four luciferase reporters (p200b-WT-luc, p200b-MT-luc, p717-WT-luc and p717-MT-luc), one of the three miRNA overexpressing plasmids (pFlag-CMV, pmiR-200b and pmiR-717), together with pSV40-β-galactosidase at the ratio of 4:3:1 under isotonic condition and grown for 24 h. Following 24 h of incubation, cells were subjected to either isotonic or hypertonic treatments for 8 h and then harvested for the luciferase reporter assays and β-galactosidase activity assay.

Time-course expression of OREBP mRNA and protein in mIMCD3 cells

mIMCD3 cells were replated on a 6-well plate and incubated in isotonic media for 24 h and until ∼80% confluency. Tonicity treatments were started by replacing old media with fresh isotonic media, hypertonic media in the presence or absence of cycoloheximde (CHX, Beyotime, Nanjing, 10 mg/ml) or actinomycin (ActD, Beyotime, Nanjing, 5 mg/ml) respectively. Cell samples were collected at 0-, 2-, 4-, 6- and 8-h time points for mRNA and protein analyses.

siRNA knocking-down of Dicer

All siRNAs were purchased from GenePharma. The sense sequences for three Dicer siRNAs and control siRNA are 5′-CUUUGGACAUUGACUUUAATT-3′ (siDicer-1), 5′-AGUGAGGUUUCAACGGAUCTT-3′ (siDicer-2), 5′-UUCUAACGUGCGAUUGUAGTT-3′ (siDicer-3) and 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′ (Control) respectively. To knock-down Dicer (NM_148948), mIMCD3 cells were transfected with Dicer siRNA and control siRNA at the final concentration of 50 nM as previously described (23) and incubated for a further 48 h. Cells were then subjected to the isotonic and hypertonic treatments for 4 h and harvested for analyses.

Real-time RT–PCR analyses of mRNAs and miRNAs

For real-time RT–PCR mRNA quantification, reverse transcription was performed with TRIzol (Invitrogen)-extracted total RNAs using a High Fidelity primeScriptTM RT-PCR Kit as instructed (Takara, Dalian). Real-time RT–PCR was performed by using the SYBR Green Real-time PCR Master Mix (TOYOBO, Shanghai) and the StepOne Real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and using the following primer pairs: OREBP (NM_133957) (Forward: 5′-CTCCTCAGATCCAGTTGGTTCA-3′, Reverse: 5′-GCTGCATGTCTGGTTGGTTTAT-3′); 18S rRNA (NR_003286) (Forward: 5′-GGTCATAAGCTTGCGTTGATTAAG-3′, Reverse: 5′-CTACGGAAACCTTGTTACGACTTT-3′).

For miRNAs, real-time RT–PCR was performed with the stem-loop primers as reported (25). U6 RNA served as an internal control. The miRNA-specific reverse transcription primers, the universal primer and the miRNA-specific reverse LNA-primers were all purchased from (Sangon, Shanghai). miR-200b (MIMAT0000233) primers: 5′-GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATTGCACTGGATACGACTCATCAT-3′ (RT), 5′-GGGGTAATACTGCCTGGT-3′ (forward), 5′-TGCGTGTCGTGGAGTC-3′ (reverse). miR-717 (MIMAT0003510) primers: 5′-GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGC-AATTGCACTGGATACGACTAGAGAA-3′ (RT), 5′-GGGGCTCAGACAGAGATA-3′ (forward), 5′-TGCGTGTCGTGGAGTC-3′ (reverse). U6 primers: 5′-CGCTTCACGAATTTGCGTGTCAT-3′ (RT), 5′-GCTTCGGCAGCACATATACTAAAAT-3′ (forward), 5′-CGCTTCACGAATTTGCGTGTCAT-3′ (reverse).

Luciferase reporter assays

Luciferase reporter activities were determined using a Luciferase Reporter Gene Assay System (Promega) as instructed. For all luciferase assays, β-galactosidase activities were determined to calibrate for the transfection efficiency. The calibrated value for a proper control was used to normalize all other values to obtain the normalized relative luciferase units (RLU) representing the activities of OREBP-3′UTR and AR-ORE.

Western blot analyses

Western blots were performed according to standard protocols. The detection was achieved using the Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate kit (Millipore). Primary antibodies are: OREBP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., sc-13035, 1:5000) and AR (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., sc-17735, 1:5000).

Mouse experiments

Animal experiments were conducted according to protocols and guidelines that were approved by the Xiamen University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Wild-type (WT) and AR-deficient (AR/−) male C57BL/6 mice were maintained as described previously (26). Three groups of 6- to 8-week mice were prepared (three per group), i.e. two for WT mice and one for AR/−. For the treatments, one WT group was injected intraperitoneally with 0.5 mg/kg of furosemide once while the control group (euhydration) and the AR-/- mice were injected intraperitoneally with the same volume of vehicle saline solution. Four hours after the injections, urine samples were collected and the mice were then were sacrificed together by cervical dislocation. Kidney medulla samples were dissected to prepare total RNA for analyses and miRNA Northern hybridization. Urine osmolarity was assayed with a STY-1 Osmometer (Tianda, Tianjin).

miRNA Northern hybridization

The digoxigenin-labeled LNA probe for miR-200b was purchased from Exiqon. Northern Hybridization was performed with digoxigenin-labeled probes as described (27).

Bioinformatics, data acquisition, image processing and statistical analyses

Mature and pre-miRNA sequences were based on MiRbase (http://microrna.sanger.ac.uk). miRNA target predictions were performed with the MiRanda (http://www.microrna.org) or Targetscan (http://www.targetscan.org) algorithms. Western and Northern images were captured by Biosense SC8108 Gel Documentation System with GeneScope V1.73 software (Shanghai BioTech). Gel images were imported into Photoshop for orientation and cropping. The digital density values were acquired by Image-Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics) and analyzed by Prism 5.0 (Graphpad). Data are the means ± SEM. One-way analysis of variance with Bonferonni’s post-test was used for multiple comparisons and the Student’s t-test (two-tailed) for pair-wise comparisons.

RESULTS

Enhanced transcription and mRNA stability and increased translation contribute significantly to hypertonicity-induced accumulation of OREBP protein

To determine how high NaCl concentration might affect the expression of OREBP mRNA and protein in a time-dependent manner, we subjected mIMCD3 to isotonic (Iso, 300 mOsmol/kg H2O) or hypertonic (Hyper, 550 mOsmol/kg H2O) media. Because the first 8 h are the most critical period for osmoregulation and the induction of osmoprotective genes including OREBP (4,12,28), we assayed the expression of OREBP mRNA and protein at 2-h intervals up to 8 h. Consistent with previous studies by other groups (12,18), OREBP mRNA increased gradually in response to hypertonic exposure and peaked at 4 h and fell subsequently, whereas its level in cells under isotonic condition remained virtually constant (Figure 1A). Furthermore, mRNA degradation in actinomycin (ActD)-treated cells under hypertonic condition was slower than that of the cells under isotonic condition, indicating that hypertonicity tended to stabilize OREBP mRNA.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Enhanced transcription and mRNA stability and increased translation contribute significantly to maximal induction of OREBP induced by hypertonicity. Hyper, high-NaCl hypertonicity (550 mOsmol/kg H2O); Iso, isotonicity (300 mOsmol/kg H2O); ActD, actinomycin D (5 µg/ml); CHX, cycloheximide (10 µg/ml) (A) Time-dependent induction of OREBP mRNA in mIMCD3 by high NaCl exposure. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; all compared with isotonic controls (Iso) (n = 3) (B) Time-dependent expression of OREBP protein in mIMCD3 cells under isotonic and hypertonic condition as determined by western blots (n = 4). All values were calibrated with the expression of β-actin and normalized with the β-actin-calibrated values at 0 h for the control cells, the CHX-treated cells or the ActD-treated cells, respectively (n = 4). ###P < 0.001, Hyper versus Iso, ***P < 0.001, (ActD + Hyper) versus (ActD + Iso). (C) Typical western blot analyses of OREBP protein expression in mIMCD3 cells under isotonic and hypertonic conditions (n = 3).

Also consistent with previous reports (12,28), significant inductions of OREBP protein became apparent at 2 h and reached peak levels by 6–8 h (Figure 1B and C) after high NaCl exposure. Although mRNA stabilization had been shown to contribute to hypertonicity-induced accumulation of OREBP mRNA and protein (12) in mIMCD3 cells, it was not clear what the underlying mechanism was and whether other posttranscriptional mechanisms might also be involved. To investigate the contribution of protein stabilization, we utilized cycloheximide (CHX) to inhibit protein biosynthesis. Following the inhibition of translation, OREBP protein decreased time-dependently for cells under either isotonic or hypertonic condition respectively. No apparent difference in the rate of degradation of OREBP protein, however, was observed between cells grown under different tonicity conditions (Figure 1B and C). This is consistent with previous pulse-chase OREBP analyses showing that hypertonicity did not significantly affect OREBP protein stability in MDCK cells (18) and it suggests that protein stabilization is not the major underlying mechanism for OREBP accumulation in mIMCD3 cells, at least during the observed period. To determine how hypertonicity might affect OREBP accumulation in the absence of de novo transcription, we further utilized ActD to stop transcription in mIMCD3 cells. Interestingly, following ActD treatment, cells grown under isotonic condition appeared to have small decreases in OREBP protein expression. In contrast, the level of OREBP protein was relatively stable for the first 4 h for cells under hypertonic condition despite the inhibition of transcription, with a big surge appeared 6 h after the tonicity exposure and then fell slightly (Figure 1B and C). Taking the absence of de novo transcription and the lack of increased protein stability into account, the surges at 6 h of OREBP protein in ActD-treated cells grown under hypertonic condition suggests important contributions from translational de-repression or increased translational efficiency of OREBP. Together, these results indicate that enhanced translation might be one of the most important factors contributing to hypertonicity-induced accumulation of OREBP protein.

miRNA-mediated silencing plays critical regulatory roles in the maximal induction of OREBP by hypertonicity

Since the 3′UTR of mRNA plays very important regulatory roles in gene expression (29), we constructed a few chimeric luciferase reporters for mouse OREBP-3′UTR and one for human OREBP-3′UTR and used them for transfections in mIMCD3 cells. Plasmid phOREBP-3′UTR-luc and pOREBP-3′UTR-luc-1 contains full-length sequences for human and mouse OREBP-3′UTR, respectively, while pOREBP-3′UTR-luc-2 contains a truncated region of mouse OREBP-3′UTR (Supplementary Figure S1 and Table S1). Consistent with the results from a previous report (12), in mouse mIMCD3 cells transfected with phOREBP-3′UTR-luc, high NaCl exposure resulted in substantial decreases in the reporter activity, suggesting that hypertonicity tended to suppress the activity of human OREBP-3′UTR (Figure 2A). When similar assays were performed with pOREBP-3′UTR-luc-1, however, a very different pattern of time-course reporter activities was obtained. The luciferase activity reflecting the stability of the chimeric mRNA and its translation was virtually not different between the isotonic and hypertonic treatment groups for the first 4 h of the tonicity exposure (Figure 2B). There were, however, sudden surges in the activity, commencing from the 6-h time point for the hypertonic treatment group while that of the control remained virtually constant. The big increases in the 3′UTR activity at 6 and 8 h correlated well with the temporal surges of mouse OREBP protein under hypertonicity (Figure 1B, upper), suggesting that hypertonicity greatly stimulated the activity of mouse OREBP-3′UTR and this stimulation might play important roles in the maximal induction of OREBP. The fact that high NaCl induced a great induction of luciferase reporter activity in mIMCD3 cells with mouse OREBP-3′UTR but not that of human OREBP-3′UTR suggests that the 3′UTR-mediated mechanisms are highly sequence specific.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

miRNA-mediated mechanisms are involved in hypertonicity-induced induction of OREBP. NS, not significant; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; all compared with tonicity-matched controls. Experiments were performed with at least three separate samples analyzed in triplicates (n = 3). (A) Time-course effects of high NaCl hypertonicity on the activity of human OREBP-3′UTR. (B) High NaCl hypertonicity time-dependently increased the activity of mouse OREBP-3′UTR. (C) Overexpression of chimeric OREBP-3′UTR-luciferase mRNAs by pOREBP-3′UTR-luc-1 resulted in a significant elevation in OREBP protein while a small but insignificant elevation was observed in cells transfected with pOREBP-3′UTR-luc-2. mIMCD3 cells were grown and transfected as described under isotonic condition. Thirty-two hours after transfection, cells were harvested for protein analyses. (D) Depletion of Dicer significantly up-regulated OREBP protein expression. mIMCD3 cells were grown and siRNA-transfected under isotonic condition to knock-down Dicer (Supplementary Figure S2). Following subsequent treatment in isotonic or hypertonic media for 4 h, cells were harvested for Western blot analyses. siDicer, siRNA for Dicer; Control, control siRNA. Gel image represents data obtained from the use of siDicer-2. The bar chart represents statistical data obtained from the use of three siRNAs, namely siDicer-1, siDicer-2 and siDicer-3.

Since the 3′UTR of a gene potentially contains regulatory sequence elements recognized by miRNAs and RNA-binding proteins to regulate mRNA stability and protein translation (20,30), we reasoned that the overexpression of such 3′UTR sequences would compete for the binding of cognate miRNAs and/or RNA-binding proteins to affect the expression of the endogenous gene. Interestingly, in mIMCD3 cells overexpressing the chimeric mouse OREBP-3′UTR-luciferase mRNA (pOREBP-3′UTR-luc-1) under isotonic conditions, endogenous OREBP protein expression was increased by ∼3-fold (P < 0.001; Figure 2C). In contrast, transfection with pOREBP-3′UTR-luc-2, which contains only a truncated region of the OREBP-3′UTR, resulted in only a small but insignificant increase. These results suggest that OREBP-3′UTR-mediated mechanisms might be responsible for the maximal induction of OREBP.

To explore the regulatory roles of miRNAs in the induction of OREBP, we first utilized siRNAs to knock-down the expression of Dicer (23), one of the most critical components responsible for the biogenesis of miRNAs (20,23,31,32). Three different siRNAs were designed and used for transfections in mIMCD3 cells. Significantly, in cells transfected with any of the three siRNAs, Dicer-depletion caused great up-regulations in OREBP protein under both the isotonic and hypertonic conditions (e.g. 2.6-folds for hypertonic condition, P < 0.001) (Figure 2D), indicating that OREBP expression could be tightly regulated by miRNAs.

High NaCl exposure induces significant alterations in miRNA expression

In an attempt to identify potential miRNAs that might respond to osmotic stress, we profiled miRNA expression in mIMCD3 cells subjected to isotonic and hypertonic treatments for 2 and 8 h, utilizing the miRCURY LNA array as instructed. Following the tonicity treatment for 2 h, there were totally 57 miRNAs that were found to be differentially expressed between the mIMCD3 cells under hypertonicity and isotonicity, with a minimum fold-change of 1.5 in either the up-regulated or down-regulated direction (P < 0.05; Supplementary Table S4). Among 18 down-regulated miRNAs, miR-200b, miR-143 and miR-717 were down-regulated by ∼10-, 7- and 5-fold (Iso/Hyper), respectively. Interestingly, being one of the most significantly down-regulated miRNAs from our array analyses, miR-200b turned out to be a member of the miR-8 family miRNAs that were found to play important roles in osmoregulation in the zebrafish inocytes recently (24). This lent credence to the validity of our dataset. In contrast to the significant alterations in miRNA expression following a 2-h tonicity exposure, only very few miRNAs were detected to be differentially expressed between cells under isotonic and hypertonic conditions following an 8-h tonicity exposure (Supplementary Table S5). This suggests that hypertonicity-induced alterations in miRNA are not sustained for long.

Of the three most significantly down-regulated miRNAs, bioinformatics analyses indicated that miR-200b and miR-717 might be OREBP-targeting whereas miR-143 is not (Supplementary Figure S3). Real-time RT–PCR was performed to determine the time-course expression for miR-200b and miR-717 in response to hypertonicity. The results indicated that following high NaCl exposure, miR-200b and miR-717 were quickly and significantly down-regulated. Within 2 h of hypertonic exposure, the levels of miR-200b and miR-717 were reduced by ∼92% and 80%, respectively (Figure 3), which largely confirmed the results from the microarray analyses. The levels of these two miRNAs, however, were gradually restored thereafter such that both were returned to the levels close to that of the isotonic controls by 8 h. Intriguingly, the expression of miR-200b primary and precursor sequences were largely consistent with the trend of the expression of the mature sequences that was strongly down-regulated time-dependently (Supplementary Figure S5). In contrast, while the expression of miR-717 precursor sequences was also consistent with the trend of the expression of the mature sequences, the expression of miR-717 primary sequences was largely constant and not affected by hypertonicity (Supplementary Figure S5). miR-200b and miR-717 thus appeared to be affected by hypertonicity at different stages of miRNA biogenesis or maturation. In spite of these, the above results established that miR-200b and miR-717 are highly tonicity-sensitive and tonicty-responsive, suggesting strongly that these two miRNAs might serve as tonicity-responsive factors that contribute to the regulation of OREBP.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

miR-200b and miR-717 are rapidly and significantly down-regulated by hypertonicity. Results were obtained from three separate samples analyzed in triplicates (n = 3).

Overexpression of miR-200b and miR-717 silences the expression of OREBP and its transcriptional activity in mIMCD3 cells

To determine whether miR-200b and miR-717 regulate OREBP expression, we constructed three miRNA expression plasmids (pmiR-143, pmiR-200b and pmiR-717; Supplementary Table S2) to overexpress miR-200b, miR-717 and miR-143, respectively, in mIMCD3 cells (Figure 4A). Interestingly, in cells overexpressing miR-200b and miR-717, respectively, the levels of OREBP mRNA were down-regulated by ∼24–39% under either isotonic or hypertonic condition (P < 0.001, Figure 4B). Paralleling the trend of mRNA down-regulation, OREBP protein exhibited significant reduction in cells overexpressing either miR-200b or miR-717 (Figure 4C). Additionally, in cells overexpressing both miR-200b and miR-717 simultaneously, the reduction of OREBP protein was greater than that of the single-plasmid transfected. Moreover, with the down-regulation of OREBP protein, the protein level of AR, which is under the transcription control of OREBP (1), was also significantly reduced in the miRNA-overexpressing cells. The functional deficits of OREBP in the miRNA-overexpressing cells were further analyzed using a chimeric pAR-ORE-luc containing three osmotic response elements (OREs) (33). While overexpression of miR-143, which is not predicted to target OREBP by either the MiRanda or Targetscan algorithms, did not cause any change in transactivation activity of OREBP, overexpression of miR-200b or miR-717 resulted in significant reductions in its transactivation activity (Figure 4D). In cells overexpressing miR-200b and miR-717 simultaneously, the transcriptional activity of OREBP was reduced by ∼65% under hypertonic condition (P < 0.001; Figure 4D), suggesting strong regulation by these two miRNAs. Together, these results indicate that miR-200b and miR-717 are capable of modulating OREBP expression.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

miR-200b and miR-717 function to silence OREBP in mIMCD3 cells. Cells were transfected with pmiR-200b or pmiR-717, respectively, under isotonic condition. Twenty-four hours after the transfection, cells were fed with either isotonic or hypertonic media and harvested 8 h later for mRNA, protein and luciferase reporter assay analyses. NS, not significant; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; all compared with tonicity-matched controls (n ≥ 3). (A) Transfection of miRNA-overexpressing plasmids significantly increased miR-143, miR-200b and miR-717. (B) Overexpression of miR-200b and miR-717 significantly down-regulated the mRNA expression of OREBP. (C) Overexpression of miR-200b and miR-717 significantly down-regulated the protein expression of OREBP and AR. (D) Overexpression of miR-200b and miR-717 significantly attenuated the transcriptional transactivation of AR by OREBP.

miR-200b and miR-717 control OREBP expression through targeting its 3′UTR

To determine whether miR-200b and miR-717 function to regulate OREBP through interactions with OREBP-3′UTR, we first co-transfected chemically synthesized miRNA mimics (pre-miRNAs) and miRNA inhibitors (anti-sense oligonucleotides) with the luciferase reporter pOREBP-3′UTR-luc-1 into mIMCD3 cells. Transfections of the precursors for either miR-200b or miR-717 (Supplementary Table S3) significantly reduced OREBP-3′UTR activity under both isotonic and hypertonic conditions (P < 0.05; Figure 5A). Conversely, inhibition of both miR-200b and miR-717 resulted in small yet significant increases in OREBP-3′UTR activity under both isotonic and hypertonic condition (P < 0.05), except that the inhibition of miR-717 did not result in a significant change in the reporter activity (Figure 5B). These results suggest that miR-200b and miR-717 might exert their silencing effects on OREBP through miRNA–3′UTR interactions.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

miR-200b and miR-717 suppress OREBP expression by targeting OREBP-3′UTR. mIMCD3 cells were co-transfected with a luciferase reporter together with miRNA precursors, miRNA inhibitors or miRNA-overexpressing plasmids, respectively, under isotonic condition for 24 h. Transfected cells were subsequently fed with either isotonic or hypertonic media and harvested 8 h later for the luciferase reporter assays as described. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001, all compared with tonicity-matched controls (n ≥ 3). (A) Co-transfection of miRNA precursors for miR-200b and miR-717 with pOREBP-3′UTRluc-1 significantly reduced OREBP-3′UTR activities. (B) Inhibition of miR-200b and miR-717 significantly increased OREBP-3′UTR activities. (C) Overexpression of miR-200b and miR-717 significantly reduced the reporter activity of pOREBP-3′UTR-luc-1. (D) Overexpression of miR-200b and miR-717 did not cause significant changes in the reporter activity of pOREBP-3′UTR-luc-2. (E) MRE site-mutation abolished the silencing effects of miR-200b under isotonic condition. (F) MRE site-mutation abolished the silencing effects of miR-717 under isotonic condition.

To further test the miRNA–OREBP-3′UTR interactions, we also co-transfected mIMCD3 cells with miRNA-overexpressing plasmids and the luciferase reporter pOREBP-3′UTR-luc-1. Consistent with the results from the miRNA precursor transfection, overexpression of both miR-200b and miR-717 significantly decreased the activities of OREBP-3′UTR under both isotonic and hypertonic conditions (Figure 5C). In contrast, overexpression of miR-143 did not result in any significant change in OREBP-3′UTR reporter activity. In another series of transfection where miRNA-overexpressing plasmids were co-transfected with pOREBP-3′UTR-luc-2, which contains no MRE for either miR-200b or miR-717 or miR-143, no significant effects were observed (Figure 5D). These results suggest that the interactions between the putative MREs on OREBP-3′UTR and miR-200b or miR-717 were specific. To further verify the specificity of the interactions, we mutated the MRE sites for miR-200b and miR-717 on the OREBP-3′UTR and created corresponding luciferase reporters (Supplementary Figures S1 and S4 and Supplementary Table S1). Using mutant and control reporters, we demonstrated that the mutations of the MREs for miR-200b and miR-717 on both the truncated versions of OREBP-3′UTR (p200b-MT-luc and p717-MT-luc; Figure 5E and F) or the full-length OREBP-3′UTR (pOREBP-3′UTR-200MT-luc and pOREBP-3′UTR-717MT-luc; Supplementary Figure S4) largely abrogated the regulatory effects by the corresponding miRNAs or miRNA inhibitors, confirming that the disruption of the putative miRNA–MRE interactions abolished the silencing effects of miRNA on OREBP. Together, these results indicate that miR-200b and miR-717 regulate OREBP by targeting OREBP-3′UTR to destabilize the mRNA and/or suppress protein translation.

miR-200b and miR-717 are linked physiologically with urine osmolarity to regulate OREBP in vivo

To determine whether miR-200b and miR-717 function to regulate OREBP expression in vivo, we investigated the effects of the alterations in the tonicity condition on the expression of miRNAs and OREBP in the renal medulla, a region constantly exposed to hypertonicity under normal circumstances. We used the diuretic furosemide to induce hypo-osmolality in the kidneys of the WT C57BL/6 mice. In addition, we also included a line of knockout mice deficient in AR (AR-/-, also in C57BL/5 background) that develop mild diabetes insipidus and accumulate hypotonic urine in the medulla due to defects in urine-concentrating mechanisms (26). As a consequence of AR deficiency or diuretics-treatment, the urine osmolarity in the AR-/- mice and the furosemide-treated mice was found to be ∼35 and 17% of that of the age-and gender-matched WT mice, respectively (P < 0.001; Figure 6A). In line with the significant alterations in the tonicity environment, the renal medullary expression of OREBP mRNA in AR-/- mice and furosemide-treated mice was greatly down-regulated (Figure 6B). On the other hand, the expression of both miR-200b and miR-717 was greatly up-regulated in AR-/- mice and furosemide–treated mice (Figure 6C and D). Since the AR-/- mice are genetically manipulated models, the similar trends of down-regulation of miR-200b and miR-717 between the AR-/- mice and furosemide-treated mice ruled out the possible side effects on renal miRNA by furosemide. These results therefore established the inverse correlations between the renal tonicity, the expression of tonicity-responsive miR-200b and miR-717 and the expression of osmoregulatory transcription factor OREBP. Together, they strongly suggest that miR-200b and miR-717 play important roles in osmoregulation/osmoadaptation by regulating the expression of OREBP.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Renal medullary expression of miR-200b and miR-717 correlates inversely with the expression of OREBP in vivo in mouse renal medulla. Six- to 8-week-old male WT and AR-/- C57BL/6 mice were provided with drinking water ad libitum and with or without furosemide injection as described. Four hours after the furosemide treatment, urine samples were collected and urine osmolarity was assayed. Kidney medulla samples were dissected and total RNA was extracted for real-time RT–PCR or northern blot analyses as described. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; all compared with the control sample from the euhydrated WT mice (n = 3) (A) Urine osmolarity was significantly reduced in furosemide-treated or AR-deficient mice. (B) OREBP mRNA expression was significantly down-regulated in furosemide-treated or AR-deficient mice. (C) Furosemide treatment and AR deficiency significantly up-regulated miR-200b and miR-717 expression in the renal medullas analyzed by real-time RT–PCR. (D) Up-regulation of miR-200b in the renal medulla in AR-deficient mice or furosemide-injected WT mice as demonstrated by northern blot analysis.

DISCUSSION

The stability of mammalian mRNA is determined by various cis- and trans-acting factors (29,30). A previous study in mIMCD3 cells suggested that hypertonicity increased OREBP mRNA and protein by stabilizing OREBP mRNA (12). Using luciferase reporter assays and the UTRs of human OREBP, however, the same study suggested that hypertonicity tended to stabilize OREBP-5′UTR but destabilized the 3′-UTR mRNA. This result was perplexing since the 3′-UTR is usually much longer and contains more cis-regulatory elements than the 5′-UTR to offer much more robust regulatory control on mRNA (29). To further clarify the issue, we first verified in this current study that hypertonicity indeed tended to destabilize human OREBP-3′UTR in mIMCD3 cells (Figure 2A). However, using a 3′-UTR from mouse OREBP, we demonstrated clearly that OREBP-3′UTR was strongly stabilized rather than destabilized (Figure 2B). Bioinformatics analysis revealed substantial RNA sequence differences between human and mouse OREBP-3′UTR, with sequence identity being only 66.9%. Apparently, the opposite trends of responses to hypertonicity between human and mouse OREBP-3′UTR in mIMCD3 cells arose from the sequence variations between these two RNA sequences. When a human OREBP-3′UTR is expressed in mouse cells, normal interactions between OREBP-3′UTR and RNA-binding proteins or miRNAs might be greatly compromised due to the sequence variations in the cis-regulatory elements. Our data thus firmly established that OREBP-3′UTR is strongly stabilized by hypertonicity to contribute critically to the induction of OREBP in the early phase of osmoregulation.

The most important posttranscriptional regulatory mechanisms that act through interacting with the 3′-UTR of mRNA include the interactions between 3′-UTR and RNA-binding proteins as well as miRNAs (20,30). Mammalian mRNA 3′-UTRs normally contain multiple cis-elements such as the adenylate/uridylate rich elements (AREs) to be recognized by RNA-binding proteins. Interactions between the 3′-UTR and a variety of RNA-binding proteins through AREs affect primarily mRNA stability, e.g. the binding of HuR with AREs tends to stabilize (34,35) whereas AUF1 tends to destabilize mRNA (35,36). Bioinformatics analyses indicate that human OREBP-3′UTR contains 30 AREs whereas mouse OREBP-3′UTR has 26. The interactions between OREBP-3′UTR AREs and RNA-binding proteins and their contributions to the induction of OREBP are not clear and are yet to be investigated further.

Long mammalian mRNA 3′-UTRs usually contain many MREs to be recognized by cognate miRNAs. In contrast to the ARE–RNA-binding protein interactions, the miRNA–MRE interactions regulate both mRNA stability and protein translation and are of great importance in gene regulation. In our current study, we investigated the regulatory roles of miRNAs in the expression of OREBP in response to environmental tonicity alterations. We demonstrated that: (i) overexpression of OREBP-3′UTR or knocking-down of Dicer greatly increases the expression of OREBP protein (Figure 2B, C and D); (ii) the expression of miRNAs are highly responsive to environmental tonicity alterations (Supplementary Table S4 and Figure 3). For example, hypertonicity down-regulates the expression of miR-200b and miR-717 rapidly and significantly (Figure 3); (iii) overexpression of miR-200b and miR-717 significantly reduces mRNA and protein expression of OREBP and its transcriptional activity (Figure 4); (iv) overexpression of miR-200b and miR-717 or transfection of chemically synthesized miRNA precursors greatly reduces the stability of OREBP-3′UTR and its translation, whereas the inhibition with anti-sense oligonucleotides or disruption of the miRNA–MRE interactions by mutating putative miRNA-binding sites abrogates the suppressive effects of these two miRNAs. Moreover, the silencing effects of individual miRNAs are additive (Figure 5); (v) in the renal medulla, the expression of miR-200b and miR-717 correlates negatively with urine osmolarity and the expression of OREBP (Figure 6). Together, these results provide strong evidence that miRNAs are important for the maximal induction of OREBP in response to hypertonicity exposure. In particular, miR-200b and miR-717 are two important regulators that are significantly down-regulated in response to hypertonicity to contribute to the maximal induction of OREBP through interacting with its 3′-UTR. Together, these findings reveal a novel layer of regulations for cellular osmosignaling and osmoregulation that will help with the better understanding of osmoresponses under physiological and pathophysiological conditions. Furthermore, miR-200b and miR-717 are two novel osmoregulators playing important regulatory roles in mammalian osmosignaling and osmoregulation.

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online.

Supplementary Data
supp_39_2_475__index.html (1,010B, html)

FUNDING

This work was supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation of China (#30970649); 973 Program of Ministry of Science and Technology of China (#2009CB941601); 111 Project of Ministry of Education and Bureau of Foreign Experts of China (#B06016) and the Science Planning Program of Fujian Province (#2009J1010). Funding for open access charge: National Science Foundation of China (#30970649).

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Prof. Z.M. Yang of XMU for helpful discussions and technical assistance and Dr Dongyan Jin of HKU for critical reading.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ko BC, Turck CW, Lee KW, Yang Y, Chung SS. Purification, identification, and characterization of an osmotic response element binding protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000;270:52–61. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.2376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Miyakawa H, Woo SK, Dahl SC, Handler JS, Kwon HM. Tonicity-responsive enhancer binding protein, a rel-like protein that stimulates transcription in response to hypertonicity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:2538–2542. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.5.2538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Trama J, Go WY, Ho SN. The osmoprotective function of the NFAT5 transcription factor in T cell development and activation. J. Immunol. 2002;169:5477–5488. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.10.5477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Burg MB, Ferraris JD, Dmitrieva NI. Cellular response to hyperosmotic stresses. Physiol Rev. 2007;87:1441–1474. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00056.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lopez-Rodriguez C, Antos CL, Shelton JM, Richardson JA, Lin F, Novobrantseva TI, Bronson RT, Igarashi P, Rao A, Olson EN, et al. Loss of NFAT5 results in renal atrophy and lack of tonicity-responsive gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:2392–2397. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308703100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jauliac S, Lopez-Rodriguez C, Shaw LM, Brown LF, Rao A, Toker A. The role of NFAT transcription factors in integrin-mediated carcinoma invasion. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002;4:540–544. doi: 10.1038/ncb816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ranjbar S, Tsytsykova AV, Lee SK, Rajsbaum R, Falvo JV, Lieberman J, Shankar P, Goldfeld AE. NFAT5 regulates HIV-1 in primary monocytes via a highly conserved long terminal repeat site. PLoS Pathog. 2006;2:e130. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.O'Connor RS, Mills ST, Jones KA, Ho SN, Pavlath GK. A combinatorial role for NFAT5 in both myoblast migration and differentiation during skeletal muscle myogenesis. J. Cell. Sci. 2007;120:149–159. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ko BC, Lam AK, Kapus A, Fan L, Chung SK, Chung SS. Fyn and p38 signaling are both required for maximal hypertonic activation of the osmotic response element-binding protein/tonicity-responsive enhancer-binding protein (OREBP/TonEBP) J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:46085–46092. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M208138200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Uhlik MT, Abell AN, Johnson NL, Sun W, Cuevas BD, Lobel-Rice KE, Horne EA, Dell'Acqua ML, Johnson GL. Rac-MEKK3-MKK3 scaffolding for p38 MAPK activation during hyperosmotic shock. Nat. Cell Biol. 2003;5:1104–1110. doi: 10.1038/ncb1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kino T, Takatori H, Manoli I, Wang Y, Tiulpakov A, Blackman MR, Su YA, Chrousos GP, DeCherney AH, Segars JH, et al. Brx mediates the response of lymphocytes to osmotic stress through the activation of NFAT5. Sci. Signal. 2009;2:ra5. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cai Q, Ferraris JD, Burg MB. High NaCl increases TonEBP/OREBP mRNA and protein by stabilizing its mRNA. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2005;289:F803–F807. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00448.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lopez-Rodriguez C, Aramburu J, Jin L, Rakeman AS, Michino M, Rao A. Bridging the NFAT and NF-kappaB families: NFAT5 dimerization regulates cytokine gene transcription in response to osmotic stress. Immunity. 2001;15:47–58. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00165-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dahl SC, Handler JS, Kwon HM. Hypertonicity-induced phosphorylation and nuclear localization of the transcription factor TonEBP. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2001;280:C248–C253. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.2001.280.2.C248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Irarrazabal CE, Liu JC, Burg MB, Ferraris JD. ATM, a DNA damage-inducible kinase, contributes to activation by high NaCl of the transcription factor TonEBP/OREBP. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:8809–8814. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403062101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Irarrazabal CE, Gallazzini M, Schnetz MP, Kunin M, Simons BL, Williams CK, Burg MB, Ferraris JD. Phospholipase C-gamma1 is involved in signaling the activation by high NaCl of the osmoprotective transcription factor TonEBP/OREBP. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:906–911. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913415107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhang Z, Ferraris JD, Irarrazabal CE, Dmitrieva NI, Park JH, Burg MB. Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated, a DNA damage-inducible kinase, contributes to high NaCl-induced nuclear localization of transcription factor TonEBP/OREBP. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2005;289:F506–F511. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00417.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Woo SK, Maouyo D, Handler JS, Kwon HM. Nuclear redistribution of tonicity-responsive enhancer binding protein requires proteasome activity. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2000;278:C323–C330. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.2000.278.2.C323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tong EH, Guo JJ, Huang AL, Liu H, Hu CD, Chung SS, Ko BC. Regulation of nucleocytoplasmic trafficking of transcription factor OREBP/TonEBP/NFAT5. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:23870–23879. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M602556200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116:281–297. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136:215–233. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Leung AK, Sharp PA. microRNAs: a safeguard against turmoil? Cell. 2007;130:581–585. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pothof J, Verkaik NS, van Ijcken W, Wiemer EA, Ta VT, van der Horst GT, Jaspers NG, van Gent DC, Hoeijmakers JH, Persengiev SP, et al. MicroRNA-mediated gene silencing modulates the UV-induced DNA-damage response. EMBO J. 2009;8:2090–2099. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Flynt AS, Thatcher EJ, Burkewitz K, Li N, Liu Y, Patton JG. miR-8 microRNAs regulate the response to osmotic stress in zebrafish embryos. J. Cell Biol. 2009;185:115–127. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200807026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Raymond CK, Roberts BS, Garrett-Engele P, Lim LP, Johnson JM. Simple, quantitative primer-extension PCR assay for direct monitoring of microRNAs and short-interfering RNAs. RNA. 2005;11:1737–1744. doi: 10.1261/rna.2148705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yang JY, Tam WY, Tam S, Guo H, Wu X, Li G, Chau JF, Klein JD, Chung SK, Sands JM, et al. Genetic restoration of aldose reductase to the collecting tubules restores maturation of the urine concentrating mechanism. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2006;291:F186–F195. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00506.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hu SJ, Ren G, Liu JL, Zhao ZA, Yu YS, Su RW, Ma XH, Ni H, Lei W, Yang ZM, et al. MicroRNA expression and regulation in mouse uterus during embryo implantation. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:23473–23484. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M800406200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Drews-Elger K, Ortells MC, Rao A, Lopez-Rodriguez C, Aramburu J. The transcription factor NFAT5 is required for cyclin expression and cell cycle progression in cells exposed to hypertonic stress. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e5245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mazumder B, Seshadri V, Fox PL. Translational control by the 3′-UTR: the ends specify the means. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2003;28:91–98. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0004(03)00002-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Guhaniyogi J, Brewer G. Regulation of mRNA stability in mammalian cells. Gene. 2001;265:11–23. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(01)00350-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wiesen JL, Tomasi TB. Dicer is regulated by cellular stresses and interferons. Mol. Immunol. 2009;46:1222–1228. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2008.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chua JH, Armugam A, Jeyaseelan K. MicroRNAs: biogenesis, function and applications. Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther. 2009;11:189–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ko BC, Ruepp B, Bohren KM, Gabbay KH, Chung SS. Identification and characterization of multiple osmotic response sequences in the human aldose reductase gene. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:16431–16437. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.26.16431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Brennan CM, Steitz JA. HuR and mRNA stability. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2001;58:266–277. doi: 10.1007/PL00000854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chen CY, Xu N, Shyu AB. Highly selective actions of HuR in antagonizing AU-rich element-mediated mRNA destabilization. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002;22:7268–7278. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.20.7268-7278.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sarkar B, Xi Q, He C, Schneider RJ. Selective degradation of AU-rich mRNAs promoted by the p37 AUF1 protein isoform. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003;23:6685–6693. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.18.6685-6693.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data
supp_39_2_475__index.html (1,010B, html)

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES