Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 24.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Neurosci. 2007 Oct 28;10(12):1608–1614. doi: 10.1038/nn1991

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Distribution of choice probabilities separated by monkeys and preferred disparity sign. In Panels a–d the near preferring neurons are summarized in the top row (N = 20, mean = 0.58 and N = 17, mean = 0.67 for monkeys 1 and 2, respectively) and far preferring neurons are shown in the second row (N = 17, mean = 0.52 and N = 17, mean 0.50 for monkeys 1 and 2, respectively). Panel f shows the psychophysical kernels for monkey 2 after re-training (symbols as in Figure 2). The peak amplitudes for near and far disparities are no longer statistically different (P = 0.38). The changed strategy in monkey 2 is mirrored by significant choice probabilities in far-preferring neurons after re-training (Panel e, N = 18, mean choice probability = 0.61, significantly larger than 0.5, P < 0.001, and different from the mean choice-probability for far-preferring neurons prior to re-training, P < 0.002). The mean choice probabilities for near-preferring remains unchanged (g, N = 18, mean choice probability = 0.65, larger than 0.5, P < 0.001, not significantly different from the mean choice probability preceding pre-training, P = 0.62). Vertical dashed lines in (a–e,g) show distribution means (blue: near-preferring; green: far-preferring; light green: far-preferring after re-training; cyan: near-preferring after re-training), to facilitate comparison.