Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 12;10:7. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-7

Table 6.

Diagnostic accuracy of the different RDTs for each species, prospective samples

Species RDT brand Number of samples tested Correctly identified by RDT (number) % Sensitivity (95% CI)





P. falciparum SDFK40 137 108 78.8 (75.3-81.1)
OptiMAL 137 125 91.2 (87.7-93.9)
SDFK60 137 136 99.3 (96.0-99.9)
Non-falciparum SDFK40 28 23 82.1 (72.9-82.1)
OptiMAL 28 17 60.7 (40.6-78.5)
SDFK60 28 20 71.4 (51.3-86.8)
P. vivax SDFK40 14 13 92.9 (66.1 - 99.8)
OptiMAL 14 14 100 (76.8-100)
SDFK60 14 13 92.9 (66.1 - 99.8)
P. ovale SDFK40 13 10 76.9 (46.2-95.0)
OptiMAL 13 2 15.4 (1.9-45.6)
SDFK60 13 6 46.2 (19.2-74.9)
P. malariae* SDFK40 1 0
OptiMAL 1 1
SDFK60 1 1
Plasmodium negative SDFK40 15 10
OptiMAL 15 3
SDFK60 15 4

* Too few samples to calculate sensitivity

Included samples were negative by microscopy and PCR, but positive by the OptiMAL and/or the SDFK60

Incorrect diagnosis consisted of two samples diagnosed as Plasmodium negative and one sample diagnosed as a single P. falciparum or a mixed infection of P. falciparum with one or more of the non-falciparum species.