Table 2.
Comparison between common sorting mechanisms.
Sorting mechanism | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
Electro-osmosis | Easy fabrication, simple control, uniform flow pattern | High input voltage(>100 V), ion depletion, low-cell viability, low throughput |
Dielectrophoresis | Able to trap cells, low-cell damage, fluid flow-independent particle movement | Cell property-dependent, low throughput, requires use of buffer of different ionic strength, complex fabrication |
Optical forces | Contactless manipulation, low-cell damage, fluid flow-independent particle movement, high purity | Limited throughput, extensive optical setup (including use of a bulky high-powered laser) |
Hydrodynamic | High throughput(>10 000 cells∕s), low-cell damage, easy fabrication, high enriching capability | Slow response, requires bulky external actuators (e.g., external check valve, syringe pump, and pneumatic pump), low purity |
Piezoelectric-actuated | High throughput(>10 000 cells∕s), fast response, low-cell damage, easy fabrication, high enriching capability | Medium puritya |
Purity can be significantly improved by adjusting the flow speed, cell concentration, and incorporation of 3D flow focusing.