Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 30;4(4):043001. doi: 10.1063/1.3511706

Table 2.

Comparison between common sorting mechanisms.

Sorting mechanism Pros Cons
Electro-osmosis Easy fabrication, simple control, uniform flow pattern High input voltage(>100 V), ion depletion, low-cell viability, low throughput
Dielectrophoresis Able to trap cells, low-cell damage, fluid flow-independent particle movement Cell property-dependent, low throughput, requires use of buffer of different ionic strength, complex fabrication
Optical forces Contactless manipulation, low-cell damage, fluid flow-independent particle movement, high purity Limited throughput, extensive optical setup (including use of a bulky high-powered laser)
Hydrodynamic High throughput(>10 000 cells∕s), low-cell damage, easy fabrication, high enriching capability Slow response, requires bulky external actuators (e.g., external check valve, syringe pump, and pneumatic pump), low purity
Piezoelectric-actuated High throughput(>10 000 cells∕s), fast response, low-cell damage, easy fabrication, high enriching capability Medium puritya
a

Purity can be significantly improved by adjusting the flow speed, cell concentration, and incorporation of 3D flow focusing.