Table 3.
GLMM (LS) | GLMM (TS) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sens | Spec | PPV | NPV | Sens | Spec | PPV | NPV | |
K=200: | ||||||||
LS FP< 0.05 | 0.42 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.25 | 0.66 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.31 |
LS FP< 0.10 | 0.61 | 0.91 | 0.97 | 0.32 | 0.77 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.39 |
K=350: | ||||||||
LS FP< 0.05 | 0.50 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.59 |
LS FP< 0.10 | 0.66 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.67 | 0.79 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.71 |
(a) GLMM approach |
LMM (LS) | LMM (TS) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sens | Spec | PPV | NPV | Sens | Spec | PPV | NPV | |
K=200: | ||||||||
LS FP< 0.05 | 0.66 (0.60, 0.75) | 0.95 | 0.99 (0.98, 0.99) | 0.36 (0.31, 0.46) | 0.77 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.39 |
LS FP< 0.10 | 0.79 (0.74, 0.83) | 0.90 | 0.98 (0.97, 0.98) | 0.47 (0.37, 0.54) | 0.84 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.49 |
K=350: | ||||||||
LS FP< 0.05 | 0.57 (0.44, 0.67) | 0.95 | 0.94 (0.92, 0.95) | 0.63 (0.56, 0.70) | 0.73 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.67 |
LS FP< 0.10 | 0.71 (0.65, 0.79) | 0.90 | 0.90 (0.88, 0.92) | 0.70 (0.66, 0.78) | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.77 |
(b) LMM approach |