Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Cogn. 2011 Feb;75(1):67–77. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.08.013

Table 2.

Recall Outcomes by Exposure Group and Modality (N=92)

Control ARND DSYM

Recall Outcome (n=26) (n=36) (n=30) Statistic1

Verbal

     Recall 8th Trial
   Final Learning Trial
10.2 (1.8) 9.2 (2.0) 8.4 (2.6) F(2, 87)=4.82, p<.01
C> DYSM2
Linear trend: p<.003

     Delayed Recall 8.3 (2.6) 7.3 (2.7) 6.4 (2.6) F(2, 86)=3.4, p<.04
C> DYSM2
Linear trend: p<.01

     Learning Slope 0.36(0.14) 0.33 (0.14) 0.26 (0.13) F(2, 87)=3.96 p<.02
C> DYSM2
Linear trend: p<.007

Nonverbal

     Recall 8th Trial
   Final Learning Trial
7.3 (1.0) 6.5 (1.7) 5.7 (2.4) F(2, 89)=5.21, p<.007
C> DYSM2
Linear trend: p<.002

     Delayed Recall 5.7 (1.8) 5.8 (1.8) 5.507 (2.2) F(2, 86)=1.05 ns

     Learning Slope 0.24 (0.1) 0.21 (0.12) 0.14 (0.16) F(2,87)=3.82, p<.03
C> DYSM2
Linear trend: p<.01
1

Multivariate analysis of variance

2

Bonferroni post hoc analysis