Table 2. Matrix of health systems research and development needs.
Level/Building Block | Governance | Human Resources | Financing | Informationa | Service Delivery, Medicines, and Technology |
Community level | How can lay boards (community leader councils) strengthen local health service delivery? (Group 1 countries) | What is the role of CHWs and private sector providers in treatment of malaria and nonmalaria fevers, and in what settings are they crucial? | What are the main financial (and other) barriers to health services use and how can these be overcome? | What is the best approach to community-based monitoring of malaria and other communicable diseases building on existing and past efforts? | How can the community components of integrated approaches (IMCI and IMAI) be strengthened and adapted to different epidemiological and system settings? |
What is the role of communities in active efforts at transmission reduction (as opposed to reducing morbidity and mortality from malaria)? | How can they be incentivized and integrated with the health system to support and sustain their performance? | — | How can health information systems include information from and to CHWs? (Group 1 countries) | — | |
Facility level | Tools for assessing illicit payment for services | What are the most effective and appropriate methods for monitoring health worker performance? | — | How can modeling and evaluation innovations for malaria eradication strengthen health systems? | Development of IMCI and IMAI updated with new diagnostic tools and adapted to the malaria elimination context |
— | What types of financial and nonfinancial incentives can best support and sustain improved health worker performance? | — | Tools for assessing local coverage, quality, and equity to apply to systems effectiveness framework | Development of appropriate multidisease diagnostic tools | |
— | — | — | — | Tools for drugs and supplies stock management | |
District level | What model(s) for district management of malaria-control programmes are effective in achieving and maintaining near zero malaria burden en route to elimination? | What are the appropriate organization and management, skill mix, human resource structure, and enabling factors to support effective service delivery? | Tools for developing efficient decentralized decision making and administration | How do we engage private providers and capture their data? | How can private provider involvement in case management, surveillance and vector control be harnessed? |
— | — | — | How can district managers be supported to use the systems effectiveness framework and tools to remove bottlenecks in service delivery? | How can data for decision-making skills be taught such that responses to resurgences in malaria burden are swiftly responded to? [17]Tools for systems effectiveness framework | |
National level | What investment and tools will ensure the quality of governance and accountability required for malaria elimination? (Groups 2 and 3). | What experience is there of strengthening health worker motivation and performance through disease-specific programmes, especially looking at global elimination initiatives (positive synergies)? | What financial resources will be required to manage the certification process at subnational and national levels? (Groups 2 and 3). | What experience is there of strengthening health management information systems through disease-specific programmes, especially looking at global elimination initiatives (positive synergies)? | What is the cost-effectiveness of different delivery modes in different national/subnational settings (e.g., community strategy versus facility, integrated curative services versus specialized, integrated vector management) malaria vector control; operations research on effect of scale on optimal organizational structures? |
What governance structures are required to manage the elimination certification process? | — | What financing mechanisms are optimal at the national level to ensure a predictable and sustained flow of resources for malaria elimination? (Group 2) | — | What experience is there of strengthening service delivery and logistics/distribution chains through disease-specific programmes, especially looking at global elimination initiatives (positive synergies)? | |
What experience is there of strengthening health system governance through disease-specific programmes, especially looking at global elimination initiatives (positive synergies). | — | — | — | — | |
Tools to identify and evaluate possible interventions required in health system governance | — | — | — | — | |
Regional and global level | What are the determinants of successful intercountry collaboration on shared public health targets? | Tools: development of better regional training | — | — | What are the strengths and weaknesses of current malaria surveillance and case-management practices in endemic countries belonging to group 2? |
Intersectoral level | Does the formulation of time-specific malaria elimination targets strengthen the participation of public and private stakeholders? | — | What are the macroeconomic benefits of malaria elimination? (Group 3) | — | What are the local geographic, economic, ecological, cultural determinants of malaria, and community and health system response? Includes operations research on service provision for mobile and marginalized populations |
— | — | — | — | What architecture and dynamics of complex intersectoral intervention strategies are required to achieve a major, sustainable, and cost-effective city-wide impact on persistent urban malaria? |
Group 1, countries that are scaling up and entering the sustained control phase, where most of the population lives in areas where malaria elimination is considered impossible with existing tools; group 2, countries with focal malaria, where a large part of the population lives in malaria-free areas, and where health systems strengthening could play a crucial role in interrupting transmission in many but not necessarily all of the existing foci. These are often countries with very diverse and complex health systems challenges; group 3, elimination-ready countries. When a group of countries is not indicated, the text applies to group 1 and group 2 countries alike.
Responsibility for these issues shared with malERA Monitoring, Evaluation, and Surveillance group.
IMAI, integrated management of adult and adolescent illness; IMCI, integrated management of childhood illness.