Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 2;93(3):e8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01555

TABLE I.

Subgroup Analyses of Fracture Type and Smoking Status

Subgroup Effect of Fracture Type* Subgroup Effect of Smoking Status*
Is the difference suggested by comparisons within rather than between studies? Yes Yes
Does the interaction test suggest a low likelihood that chance explains the apparent subgroup effect? P = 0.011 P = 0.0013
Were the subgroup hypothesis and its direction specified a priori? Yes No
Is it one of a small number of subgroup hypotheses tested? 1 of 7 subgroup hypotheses 1 of 12 subgroup hypotheses
Is the magnitude of the subgroup effect large? 60% difference in RR reduction 88% difference in RR reduction
Is the observed differential effect consistent across studies? No No evidence
Is there indirect evidence supporting the hypothesized differential effects? Yes No
*

RR = relative risk.

Test for interaction.