Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 4;84(2):200–207. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0503

Table 1.

Sensitivity of dengue surveillance systems in American countries and corresponding expansion factors

Study Country Period Type of dengue case Method Expansion factors
Duarte and Franca42 Brazil 1996–2002 Hospitalized dengue case Sensitivity of the surveillance system using hospital records as the reference Overall = 1.6 (1.4–1.8); DHF = 1.4 (1.3–1.5); DF = 2.1 (1.6–3.0)
Camacho and others63 Colombia 1995–1997 All types of dengue cases Sensitivity of the surveillance system using emergency room medical records as the reference Overall = 9
Standish and others44 Nicaragua 2004–2008 All types of dengue cases Comparison of incidence obtained through active surveillance with reported incidence in the same area Clinically diagnosed: 20.4 (2004–2008), 16 (2007–2008), 28 (2005–2006); lab-confirmed: 23.1 (2004–2008), 14 (2006–2007), 28 (2005–2006)
Dechant and Rigau-Perez41 Puerto Rico 1991–1995 Hospitalized dengue case Capture–recapture method 1991–1995 = 2.4; 1991 = 2.3; 1993 = 3.4
Rigau-Perez43 Puerto Rico 1988–1997 Hospitalized dengue case Sensitivity and specificity of the surveillance system compared with hospital records Overall = 3

Figures in parentheses correspond to 95% confidence intervals assuming a binomial distribution for sensitivity analysis.