Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 4;84(2):234–238. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0134

Table 1.

Correlation values between human WNV disease incidence and the proportion of each land cover at a county resolution at the national extent

Land cover type Pearson P value Spearman P value
Developed, open space −0.21 < 2.20 × 10−16 −0.11 1.43 × 10−9
Developed, low intensity −0.25 < 2.20 × 10−16 −0.11 5.39 × 10−10
Developed, medium intensity −0.18 < 2.20 × 10−16 −0.09 1.96 × 10−7
Developed, high intensity −0.12 1.40 × 10−11 −0.04 0.034
Barren land −0.05 0.008 −0.06 5.50 × 10−4
Deciduous forest −0.51 < 2.20 × 10−16 −0.46 < 2.20 × 10−16
Evergreen forest −0.29 < 2.20 × 10−16 −0.32 < 2.20 × 10−16
Mixed forest −0.32 < 2.20 × 10−16 −0.36 < 2.20 × 10−16
Shrub 0.03 0.06 −0.04 0.012
Grassland 0.46 < 2.20 × 10−16 0.27 < 2.20 × 10−16
Pasture −0.28 < 2.20 × 10−16 −0.22 < 2.20 × 10−16
Crops 0.3 < 2.20 × 10−16 0.35 < 2.20 × 10−16
Woody wetland −0.19 < 2.20 × 10−16 −0.11 8.69 × 10−10
Herbaceous wetland 0.1 5.01 × 10−9 0.14 1.01 × 10−14

Land cover types in bold font are statistically significant.