Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 4;84(2):234–238. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0134

Table 3.

Associations between human WNV disease incidence and land cover at the regional extent

Land cover Positive Negative
Developed, open space Mid-South, Great Lakes, New England, Mid-Atlantic Upper Plains, Northwest
Developed, low intensity Mid-South, Great Lakes, New England, Mid-Atlantic Upper Plains, Northwest, South Central
Developed, medium intensity Mid-South, Great Lakes, New England, Mid-Atlantic Upper Plains, Northwest
Developed, high intensity Mid-South, Great Lakes, New England, Mid-Atlantic, South Central Upper Plains, Northwest
Barren land Mid-Atlantic Deep South, Great Lakes, Southwest
Deciduous forest None Upper Plains, Deep South, Mid-South, Great Lakes, Mid-Atlantic, Northwest, South Central
Evergreen forest None Upper Plains, Deep South, Mid-South, Great Lakes, New England, Northwest, South Central, Southwest
Mixed forest None Upper Plains, Mid-South, Great Lakes, New England, Northwest, South Central, Southwest
Shrub Deep South Mid-South, Great Lakes, New England, Southwest
Grassland Upper Plains, Northwest, South-Central, Southwest Deep South, Great Lakes, Mid-Atlantic
Pasture None Upper Plains, South Central
Crops Deep South, Mid-South, Great Lakes, Mid-Atlantic, Northwest, South Central, Southwest Upper Plains
Woody wetland Deep South, Mid-Atlantic Upper Plains, Great Lakes, South Central
Herbaceous wetland Mid-Atlantic, Southwest Great Lakes

Regions are listed by significant positive or negative associations with specific land cover types.