Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 4;84(2):261–266. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0092

Table 2.

Comparison of the results of the diagnostic tests between the first and second evaluation of subjects from a VL-endemic area

Diagnostic test First evaluation Second evaluation
Total positive Remained positive Became positive Total positive
Positive 122/246 (49.6%) 105/122 (86.1%) 51/124 (41.1%) 156/246 (63.4%)
MST 71/246 (28.9%) 62/71 (87.3%) 52/175 (29.7%) 144/246 (46.3%)
TRALd 31/246 (12.6%) 3/31 (9.7%) 2/215 (0.9%) 5/246 (2.0%)
IIFT 31/246 (12.6%) 24/31 (77.4%) 63/215 (29.3%) 87/246 (35.4%)
ELISAp 110/246 (44.7%) 84/110 (76.4%) 58/136 (42.7%) 142/246 (57.7%)
ELISArk39 105/246 (42.7%) 75/105 (71.4%) 73/141 (51.8%) 148/246 (60.2%)
ELISArk26 191/246 (77.6%) 107/191 (56.0%) 26/55 (47.3%) 133/246 (54.1%)
Negative 124/246 (50.4%) 73/124 (58.9%) 17/122 (13.9%) 90/246 (36.6%)
MST 175/246 (71.1%) 123/175 (70.3%) 9/71 (12.7%) 132/246 (53.7%)
TRALd 215/246 (87.4%) 213/215 (99.1%) 28/31 (90.3%) 241/246 (98.0%)
IIFT 215/246 (87.4%) 152/215 (70.7%) 7/31 (22.6%) 159/246 (64.6%)
ELISAp 136/246 (55.3%) 78/136 (57.4%) 26/110 (23.6%) 104/246 (42.3%)
ELISArk39 141/246 (57.3%) 68/141 (48.2%) 30/105 (28.6%) 98/246 (39.8%)
ELISArk26 55/246 (22.4%) 29/55 (52.7%) 84/191 (44.0%) 113/246 (45.9%)

McNemar test (P < 0.001 for all comparisons between first and second evaluation).