Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 17;15(2):253–260. doi: 10.1007/s10461-010-9810-0

Table 4.

Multivariate analysis of online sexual partners, exchanged sex, and STI testing among homeless youth (n = 201), Los Angeles, CA, 2009

Had sex with online partner Exchanged sex STI testing
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR. 95% CI
Age 1.11 (0.83, 1.47) 1.00 (0.68, 1.48)* 1.11 (0.80, 1.53)*
Male 2.03 (0.65, 6.37) 0.14 (0.03, 0.82)* 0.16 (0.03, 0.91)*
African American 1.14 (0.38, 3.42) 0.31 (0.05, 2.02) 2.17 (0.54, 8.69)
GLB 4.01 (1.37, 11.72)** 0.75 (0.16, 3.62) 9.85 (1.05, 92.13)
Time homeless 1.00 (0.87, 1.15) 1.36 (0.29, 6.39) 1.14 (0.92, 1.41)
Unsheltered 0.30 (0.09, 1.05) 0.26 (0.04) 1.96 (0.46, 8.36)
Had sex with online partner 6.82 (1.35, 34.52)* 1.85 (0.26, 13.30)
Talk to friends on OSN about videos 1.41 (0.47, 4.20) 1.63 (0.31, 8.46) 0.95 (0.24, 3.82)
Talk to friends on OSN about drinking/drugs 0.80 (0.56, 1.13) 2.03 (1.19, 3.45)** 0.83 (0.55, 1.26)
Talk to friends on OSN about sex 1.25 (0.95, 1.65) 1.08 (0.75, 1.56) 1.01 (0.71, 1.44)
Talk to friends on OSN about love 1.10 (0.90, 1.35) 0.71 (0.49, 1.01)* 1.04 (0.78, 1.39)
Talk to friends on OSN about safe sex 1.54 (1.13, 2.11)** 1.19 (0.80, 1.77) Predicts perfectly
Talk to friend on OSN about being homeless 0.91 (0.76, 1.10) 0.92 (0.71, 1.19) 0.96 (0.79, 1.17)
Talk to friends on OSN about school 0.87 (0.76, 1.01) 1.09 (0.89, 1.35) 0.88 (0.73, 1.07)
Does not use online social networks 0.88 (0.72, 1.08) 1.23 (0.97, 1.55) 0.80 (0.68, 0.94)**
Log likehood −56.66 −33.53 −41.70

P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01