Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 13;3:87–101. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evq084

Table 3.

Correlations between Pathway Position and ω, dN, and dS for Each Phylogenetic Branch (Data Set 2)

# Species Brancha n ω
dN
dS
ρ Pb ρ Pb ρ Pc
6 Alld 21 −0.136 0.279 −0.294 0.098 −0.229 0.318
a 21 −0.252 0.136 −0.255 0.133 −0.108 0.642
b 21 −0.116 0.309 −0.314 0.083 −0.505 0.020*
c 21 −0.382 0.044* −0.422 0.028* −0.409 0.065
d 20 −0.115 0.315 −0.278 0.118 −0.190 0.422
e 20 −0.198 0.201 −0.331 0.077 −0.183 0.439
f 21 −0.101 0.332 −0.096 0.339 −0.190 0.409
g 13 −0.828 <0.001*** −0.824 0.001*** 0.030 0.922
h 21 −0.316 0.082 −0.394 0.039* −0.144 0.534
i 16 −0.392 0.067 −0.439 0.045* 0.071 0.794
5e Alld 21 −0.304 0.090 −0.441 0.023* −0.164 0.477
a 21 −0.434 0.025* −0.455 0.019* −0.254 0.267
b 21 −0.279 0.111 −0.395 0.038* −0.408 0.066
c 21 −0.500 0.011* −0.482 0.014* −0.389 0.081
d 20 −0.339 0.072 −0.426 0.031* −0.080 0.739
f + i 21 −0.196 0.197 −0.214 0.176 −0.193 0.402
g 13 −0.797 0.001*** −0.766 0.001** 0.011 0.971
h 21 −0.446 0.022* −0.549 0.005* −0.307 0.175

Note.—Unless noticed otherwise, all correlations are based on values estimated under the FR model.

a

Branch codes according to figure 2.

b

One-tailed P values.

c

Two-tailed P values.

d

Using overall ω, dN, and dS values (M0 model).

e

Excluding Ornithorhynchus anatinus.

*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.