Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 27;20(2):224–235. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1486-7

Table 2.

Common characteristics about studies included in the systematic review

Source Country Published year Study design Disease No. of patients No. of levels (mean)
A P Total A P
Kristof et al. [28] Germany 2009 NRCT CSM 42 61 103 2 3
Bapat et al. [30] India 2008 NRCT CSM 20 25 45 3.0 3.2
Edwards et al. [34] USA 2001 Cohort CM 13 13 26 ≥3 ≥3
Wada et al. [35] Japan 2001 NRCT CSM 23 24 47 2.3 2.5
Yonenobu et al. [37] Japan 1992 NRCT CSM 41 42 83 2.5 2.6
Lee et al. [29] South Korea 2008 NRCT OPLL 20 27 47 3.4 5.5
Iwasaki et al. [31] Japan 2007 NRCT OPLL 27 66 93 3.0 5.7
Jain et al. [32] India 2005 NRCT OPLL 14 13 27 ≥4 ≥4
Tani et al. [33] Japan 2002 NRCT OPLL 14 12 26 3.2 5.6
Goto and Gita [36] Japan 1995 NRCT OPLL 7 57 64 ≥3 ≥3

NRCT non-randomized controlled clinical trial, OPLL multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, CSM multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy, MCM multilevel cervical myelopathy, No. number