Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 29;41(1):21–31. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9233-1

Table 4.

Results of multiple linear regression analyses regressing allostatic load on chronic stress domains, without (model 1) and with (model 2) control for lifestyle factors

B SE B β ΔR 2 ΔF
Model 1: Association between allostatic load and chronic stress domains, after adjusting for covariates (n = 298)
Covariates 12.1% F 7,290 = 5.72***
Chronic stress domains 7.1% F 8,282 = 3.09***
 Personal health problems 0.079 0.167 0.027
 Health problems—family member −0.075 0.119 −0.040
 Drug/alcohol problems—family −0.050 0.117 −0.026
 Work stress 0.290 0.140 0.120**
 Financial strain 0.336 0.119 0.178***
 Housing problems −0.031 0.155 −0.012
 Relationship stress −0.218 0.137 −0.109
 Caregiving stress 0.315 0.127 0.142***
Model 2: Model 1 plus lifestyle factors (n = 287)
Covariates 12.0% F 7,279 = 5.42***
Lifestyle Factors 3.5% F 5,274 = 2.26**
 Current smoker 0.009 0.115 0.004
 Alcohol consumption −0.272 0.122 −0.130**
 Fiber 0.006 0.124 0.003
 Fat 0.192 0.122 0.093
 Exercise −0.118 0.125 −0.057
Chronic stress domains 6.4% F 8,266 = 2.72***
 Personal health problems 0.087 0.170 0.030
 Health problems—family member −0.094 0.121 −0.051
 Drug/alcohol problems -family −0.047 0.119 −0.024
 Work stress 0.320 0.146 0.130**
 Financial strain 0.284 0.121 0.151**
 Housing problems −0.006 0.158 −0.002
 Relationship stress −0.235 0.140 −0.118*
 Caregiving stress 0.279 0.129 0.127**

Covariates are age, menopausal status, SES, employment status, marital status, health insurance status, and language of assessment. R 2 and F change are for model step. All coefficients are from final model step

*p < 0.10; **p < 0.05; ***p < 0.01