Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Schizophr Res. 2010 Oct 28;126(1-3):164–173. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.09.011

Table 3.

Performance of siblings and controls on the measure of general cognitive ability “g” and across individual cognitive domains.

Siblings
Controls
dferror F p
n mean (SD) n mean (SD)



General Cognitive Ability “g” 357 −0.232 (0.53) 649 −0.024 (0.50) 1001 16.52 <.001


Processing Speed 363 −0.346 (0.74) 679 −0.052 (0.78) 1037 30.28 <.001
N-back Performance 256 −0.508 (1.00) 612 −0.027 (0.85) 863 24.56 <.001
Span Working Memory 359 −0.150 (0.88) 545 −0.025 (0.84) 899 0.56 .455
Verbal Memory 363 −0.153 (0.84) 679 −0.019 (0.85) 1037 1.77 .184
Visual Memory 360 −0.036 (1.00) 407 −0.041 (0.94) 762 1.67 .196
Card Sorting Ability 358 −0.274 (0.90) 655 −0.030 (0.84) 1008 7.01 .008

Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). ANCOVA controlling for age, education, and race differences examined how siblings and controls differed in “g”. Included in general cognitive ability “g” are the six cognitive domains listed above; “g” is a mean value of the performance in the six individual domains. Following significant effect of schizophrenia risk in a multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) of the six domains, ANCOVAs were completed for each domain. All statistic values are F from ANCOVA, adjusting for age, education, and race. Bold indicates p < .05.