Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Sci. 2010 Aug 23;21(9):1282–1290. doi: 10.1177/0956797610380699

Table 3.

Comparisons between models predicting sensation seeking from 1) only covariates; and 2) covariates and all SNPs meeting p < 0.05 and FDR < 0.10 in the association tests.

Model SNPs R2 ΔR2 −2LL df p AIC BIC
1. Covariates only 0 27.9% 4113.0 8 4129.0 4164.7
2. All significant SNPs 12 31.7% 3.9% 4027.5 20 < 4 × 10−13 4067.5 4156.5

Note. SNPs = number of single nucleotide polymorphisms included in the model; R2 = proportion of variance in the dependent variable explained by the covariates and any SNPs included in that regression model; ΔR2 = additional variance explained by adding SNPs (model 2) to the covariate model (model 1); −2LL = −2 times the log-likelihood of the regression model; df = degrees of freedom in the regression model; p = the p-value when comparing model 2 to model 1, estimated by the change in −2LL on a chi-square distribution with df equal to the difference in dfs between the models; AIC = Akaike’s Information Criterion, where lower values indicate better model fit to the data; BIC = Bayesian Information Criterion, where lower values indicate better model fit to the data.