Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 31;6(1):e14638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014638

Table 1. Prevalence and rate of reversion of RT mutations at baseline (BL), 2 months (2mo) and 4 months (4mo) Structured Treatment Interruption (STI) and associated changes in Replication Capacity (RC).

Prevalence baseline Prevalence 2 months Prevalence 4 months % reversionBL-2mo % reversion2mo–4mo % reversionBL–4mo RC gaina
E44D 26.2 22.6 22.6 14 5 18.2 90
T69D 21.4 16.7 14.3 22 14 33.3 76
108I 21.4 16.7 8.3 28 46 61.1 58
181C 39.3 36.9 28.6 9 33 39.4 57
184V 69.0 41.7 19 40 57 74.1 53.5
67N 57.1 42.9 31 27 26 45.8 51.25
219Q 17.9 15.5 8.3 20 50 60.0 50
118I 41.7 29.8 25 29 24 42.9 48
103N 53.6 36.9 21.4 36 41 62.2 45
215F 26.2 15.5 10.7 41 38 63.6 41
70R 22.6 21.4 14.3 32 46 63.2 39.75
41L 73.8 51.2 38.1 32 29 50.0 36
215Y 66.7 52.4 38.1 23 30 44.6 34
210W 54.8 44 36.9 22 14 32.6 30
74V 34.5 22.6 11.9 34 58 72.4 29
100I 14.3 11.9 6 17 50 58.3 16.8
190A 21.4 20.2 14.3 11 38 44.4 15.55
a

: RC gain was defined as the difference in median RC between the viruses who showed the reversion of a given mutation and the viruses who kept the mutation between baseline and 2 months STI.

The prevalence of each mutation decreased over the course of the STI. The last column of the table represents the difference between the median ΔRC of the samples which reverted a mutation back to wild-type codon and the median ΔRC of the samples which did not revert the mutation. Most mutation reversions were associated with an increase in RC over the course of the STI. The largest increase in RC occurred between baseline and 2 months of STI. Between 2 months and 4 months of STI, the reversion of mutations was also associated with an increase in RC, although of a lesser magnitude since RC was already close to 100% at 2 months (data not shown).