Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Biomater. 2010 Nov 11;7(3):1249–1264. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.007

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Compressive properties, including Young’s modulus (A) and off-set yield strength (B), of 3D macroporous PPF and PPF/HA scaffolds (n=5). The result demonstrated that the PPF/HA 20% group showed significantly higher Young’s modulus than the PPF control and PPF/HA 10% groups. Off-set yield strength in the PPF/HA 20% group was also higher than in the other groups. # indicates a significant difference between groups (p<0.05).