Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 26;10:e60. doi: 10.5334/ijic.525

Table 3.

Governance models

Size Province Jurisdiction for mental health Budget authority Network governance model Network governance mechanism Social power
Rural
 A Ontario Provincial: Delegated1 Provincial Mutual adjustment Executive Commitee2 Influence
 B Alberta Regional: Devolved Regional Corporate Executive Committee3 Authority
Small urban
 C New Brunswick Regional: Devolved Mental Health Network Corporate Executive Committee Authority
Mid-size urban
 D Quebec Sub-regional: Deconcentrated Regional Alliance Table de concertation Negotiation
 E Quebec Sub-regional: Deconcentrated Regional Alliance Table de concertation Negotiation
 F Ontario Provincial: Delegated1 Provincial Alliance Executive Committee Negotiation
Large urban
 G Quebec Sub-regional: Deconcentrated Regional Mutual adjustment Table de concertation Influence
 H Ontario Provincial: Delegated1 Provincial Mutual adjustment None Influence
 I Ontario Provincial: Delegated1 Provincial Mutual adjustment None Influence
 J Alberta Regional: Devolved Regional Corporate Executive Committee Authority

1Delegated to the Ministry regional office.

2An executive committee functions at a sub-network level. Network A: Community services only; Network H: Centralized case management services only.

3In addition to the Executive Team, governance occurred through an Integration Steering Committee, several Integrated Service Teams, and a Joint Director responsible for all mental health services, a position that was put in place prior to the transferred of authority for mental health services to the Regional Health Authority.