Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep;16(5):1030–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.06.010

Table 3.

Recent illness, health service use, and concentration indicesa for HWS 2001 and 2005.

Sources: Health and Welfare Surveys 2001 and 2005.

Frequency (%) Age–sex adjusted concentration indices (C*) Normalisedbconcentration indices (%)
2001 Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural

2001
N 63,887 104,254
Recent illness (2 weeks) 13.4 16.0
No service used 7.6 9.8 −0.057 −0.054 −6.2 −6.0
Pharmacies 29.8 22.3 0.017 0.045 2.4 5.8
Health centres 4.7 20.0 −0.192 −0.090 −20.1 −11.3
Community hospitals 8.2 16.5 −0.319 −0.080 −34.7 −9.6
Regional/provincial/general hospitals 26.8 20.1 −0.016 0.056 −2.2 7.0
Private clinics 13.4 9.1 0.070 0.083 8.1 9.1
Private hospitals 9.5 2.1 0.306 0.364 33.8 37.2
Total 100.0 100.0



2005
N 21,015 30,996
Recent illness (1 month) 14.7 21.2
No service used 9.0 9.9 −0.083 −0.042 −9.1 −4.7
Pharmacies 28.9 19.8 0.037 0.028 5.2 3.5
Health centres 4.5 22.6 −0.301 −0.123 −31.5 −15.9
Community hospitals 10.7 21.8 −0.297 −0.065 −33.3 −8.3
Regional/provincial/general hospitals 19.8 9.5 0.039 0.125 4.9 13.8
Private clinics 14.7 14.2 0.054 0.124 6.3 14.5
Private hospitals 12.5 2.3 0.210 0.474 24.0 48.5



Total 100.0 100.0
a

The concentration index is negative (or positive) when the health outcome is concentrated towards the lower (or higher) end of the socioeconomic scale. The larger its absolute value (maximum=1.0), the more pronounced the inequality is. Normalised results are presented as percentages of limiting values for each concentration index.

b

Possible values range from −100 to +100.