Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 6;13(1):30–43. doi: 10.1208/s12248-010-9241-x

Table V.

RD, ED, Recovery (%), Emission (%), Impaction Loss, MMAD, GSD and FPF of Salbutamol Sulphate from Different Formulation Blends (Mean ± SD, n = 3)

Lactose product formulations RD (μg) ED (μg) Recovery (%) Emission (%) Impaction loss (%) MMAD (μm) GSD FPF (%)
Commercial lactose 317 ± 5 299 ± 7 65.9 ± 1.1 94.5 ± 0.6 67.8 ± 4.7 3.2 ± 0.4 2.2 ± 0.1 19.7 ± 1.9
Crystallised using ethanol 400 ± 5 380 ± 5 83.2 ± 1.0 95.0 ± 0.1 55.6 ± 6.4 3.2 ± 0.1 2.2 ± 0.0 28.9 ± 5.6
Crystallised using ethanol/butanol (60:20) 419 ± 13 403 ± 13 87.1 ± 2.6 96.1 ± 0.3 51.8 ± 4.0 3.2 ± 0.1 2.1 ± 0.0 32.1 ± 2.6
Crystallised using ethanol/butanol (40:40) 398 ± 16 383 ± 14 82.7 ± 3.3 96.3 ± 0.4 56.1 ± 5.1 3.6 ± 0.0 2.1 ± 0.0 27.3 ± 3.6
Crystallised using ethanol/butanol (20:60) 405 ± 39 381 ± 42 84.1 ± 8.1 94.1 ± 1.2 40.0 ± 3.6 3.4 ± 0.0 2.1 ± 0.1 38.0 ± 2.5
Crystallised using butanol 393 ± 40 372 ± 40 81.6 ± 8.2 94.8 ± 0.6 49.2 ± 3.1 2.9 ± 0.0 2.2 ± 0.0 35.4 ± 2.5

RD recovered dose, ED emitted dose, MMAD mass median aerodynamic diameter, GSD geometric standard deviation, FPF fine particle fraction