Table 1.
Study/Year | Publication Status | Study Method | Participants | Evaluation Point | Summary of Findings |
Berenson et al5/2009 | Published | Interview | Administrators (n = 453 pre and 58+ post) | Pre/Post | • Pre: Perception that substantial costs are not justified by potential benefit, that current staffing was adequate, and that onsite was preferable to off-site staff. |
• Post: Broad perception that TICU improves quality and safety, but no objective data support those beliefs. Frustration with IT interface problems. | |||||
Coletti et al30/2008 | Published | Quantitative survey | Medical ICU residents (n = 35) | Post | • 77% reported improved patient safety. |
• 63% reported improved ability to focus on urgent patient issues. | |||||
• 51% reported increase in uninterrupted periods of rest. | |||||
• 37% reported that TICU held educational value. | |||||
Crawley31/2008 | Meeting abstract | Case study | Staff (n = NR) | Post | • Reports of enhanced training of physician staff, high system reliability, and enhanced Army-Navy cooperation. |
• Perceived workload increase, big-brother concerns, lack of need, failure to recognize when help is needed, and IT interface/security challenges. | |||||
DiMartino et al29/2009 | Meeting abstract | Quantitative survey | Nurses (n = 91) | Post | • 72% believed that TICU increases patient survival. |
• 47% believed that TICU prevents errors. | |||||
• 42% believed that TICU improves family satisfaction. | |||||
• 13% felt “spied upon.” | |||||
• 11% believed that TICU was intrusive. | |||||
• 9% believed that TICU interrupted workflow. | |||||
• 79% believed that knowing the telephysician was important, and 61% were more likely to contact the consultant if they knew the physician on call. | |||||
Faiz et al32/2006 | Meeting abstract | Quantitative survey | Telephysicians (n = 16) | Post | • Of 16 fellows rotating through the eICU remote site, 14 of 16 would want to work in a place with TICU, and 13 of 16 believed that it protected against liability. |
• All believed that TICU improved patient care. | |||||
Grundy et al28/1977 | Published | Quantitative and qualitative survey | Physicians and nurses (n = NR) | Post | • 88% of nurses believed that TICU benefited patients, and 70% believed that it enhanced education. |
• Nurses reported positive attitudes toward TICU on 40 occasions and negative attitudes on 21. | |||||
• Over time, resistance was replaced by enthusiasm. | |||||
• Physicians reported positive attitudes toward TICU on 17 occasions and negative attitudes on 4. | |||||
• Although acceptance increased over time, physicians implemented only 46% of consultant suggestions in the last 84 d of the program. Some physicians resented the consultant. | |||||
Heath et al33/2009 | Published | Quantitative survey | Physicians (n = 41consultations), Teleintensivists (n = 63 consultations) | Post | • Unit of analysis was the consultation. |
• In 88% of pediatric consultations to rural EDs, the physician agreed that consultation improved care. | |||||
• In 89% of consultations, the consulting intensivist agreed that the consultation improved care. | |||||
Kowitlawakul34/2008 | Published | Quantitative and qualitative survey | Nurses (n = 117 quantitative and n = 34 qualitative) | Pre | • On a five-point Likert scale, the item mean was 3.3 on the 21-item Nurse Attitudes Toward eICU survey. |
• The item mean was 3.2 on the six-item Intention to Use scale. | |||||
• Nurses believed that TICU would benefit units without adequate physician coverage and might benefit new nurses. | |||||
• Nurses believed that it was unnecessary in some units, that conflicts between on- and off-site staff could undermine patient outcomes, and that it could lead to extra work and staff cuts. | |||||
Marcin et al35/2004 | Published | Quantitative survey | Physicians (n = 53), nurses, respiratory therapists (n = 17) | Post | • On a five-point Likert scale, overall satisfaction averaged 4.56 for referring physicians and 4.53 for nurses and respiratory therapists. |
• Among aspects of TICU consultations, the physicians scored audiovisual quality lowest (mean, 4.31), and the nurses and respiratory therapists scored ease of equipment use lowest (mean, 3.59). | |||||
Marttos et al27/2008 | Meeting abstract | Quantitative survey | Clinicians (physicians and nurses, n = 71 combined), both bedside and telepresence | Post | • Results were very positive on the basis of means of a five-point Likert scale: overall experience, 4.29; user satisfaction, 4.22; technical issues, 4.31; and clinical application, 4.17. |
• No significant variation over time suggested positive attitudes toward TICU from first use. | |||||
Mathews et al36/2007 | Published | Case study | Nurses (n = NR) | Pre/Post | • Prior to implementation, nurses were apprehensive and resistant, fearing repercussions from constant monitoring, increased workload, and increased nurse to patient ratios. |
• A work team was able to decrease apprehension and increase acceptance of TICU staff. | |||||
McNelis et al26/2008 | Meeting abstract | Quantitative survey | Physicians (n = NR) | Post | • Staff intensivists communicated with surgical ICU staff during off hours through robot or telephone. |
• Satisfaction with the robot (mean, 6.5) was significantly greater than satisfaction with the telephone (mean, 4.5). | |||||
Mora et al37/2007 | Meeting abstract | Quantitative survey | Residents (n = 96) | Post | • Of the residents with TICU experience, 82.3% believed that it improves patient care, and 73.8% believed that it improves the care they deliver to patients; 66.7% desired telemonitoring postresidency. |
• Of events potentially benefiting from telemonitoring, ventilator management was mentioned by the most (70%), and supervision of online placement was mentioned the least (42%). | |||||
Poropatich et al25,45,46/2008 | Meeting abstract | Quantitative survey | Physicians (n = 8), residents (n = 22), nurses (n = 45) | Post | • On a 10-point scale, overall satisfaction averaged 8.5 for physicians, 8.1 for residents, and 8.3 for nurses. |
• A majority of physicians and residents believed that the robot saved time. | |||||
• Measured collectively, no clinicians believed that the telephone was better than the robot or that the video or audio quality was poor. | |||||
• 95% believed that remote telepresence improves care. There was high satisfaction with no difference in support between types of providers. | |||||
Roberts and Dewoody38/2008 | Published | Quantitative survey | Nurses (n = NR) | Pre/Post | • The development of an orientation program for eICU care staff was associated with increased staff satisfaction with eICU and increased number of assistance calls and interactions with teleclinicians. |
Rogove et al39/2009 | Meeting abstract | Quantitative survey | Physicians (n = NR) | Post | • Physician satisfaction by survey was excellent. |
Siek et al24/2008 | Meeting abstract | Case study | Physicians, nurses (n = NR) | Post | • Pulmonary and critical care physicians appreciated consultations with colleagues, but the cardiovascular surgeon would not use the eICU resource. |
• Nurses believed that the system was great and provided resources for the night shift, but they noted manipulation of physicians. | |||||
Stafford et al40/2008 | Published | Interview | Telephysicians (n = 26), telenurses (n = 44) | Post | • Physical stress and boredom were challenges, but the telecenter fosters teamwork with a focus on improved patient care. |
• Telestaff can become frustrated by the inability to directly intervene and by the resistance encountered from ICU staff. | |||||
• Calls from ICU nurses increase when (they learn) consulting physicians are on duty. | |||||
Sucher et al23/2009 | Meeting abstract | Quantitative survey | Physicians, nurses (n = NR) | Pre | • 67% agreed that the robot would facilitate patient care between intensivists and bedside clinicians, and 72% agreed that the robot would assist bedside clinicians in managing emergencies. |
Thomas et al41/2007 | Published | Quantitative survey | Physicians (n = NR) | Pre/Post | • The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire revealed that a significant increase in the mean teamwork score (from 69.7 to 78.8) and safety climate score (from 66.4 to 73.4) after TICU was implemented. |
• Item scores also revealed a decrease in perceived interruptions, an increase in confidence that patients are adequately covered, and an increase in belief that a physician can be accessed in an emergency. | |||||
Westbrook et al22,47‐49/2008 | Published | Interviews, quantitative survey | Physicians (n = 6), nurses (n = 12),telephysicians (n = 13) | Post | • Following implementation of a virtual critical care unit in Australia, all consulting physicians reported that they were able to increase decision support to ED clinicians, and this had improved patient management. |
• Many also noted increased workload and responsibility; 71% were satisfied with TICU design. | |||||
• ED physicians perceived greater support, and nurses reported increased autonomy and less stress. | |||||
• 65% of ED clinicians were satisfied with TICU design. | |||||
• The majority of all respondents reported improved interhospital relationships. | |||||
Youn42/2006 | Published | Quantitative survey | Nurses (n = NR) | Post | • Nursing satisfaction averaged 4.7 to 5.0 (on a five-point scale) for improved communication and collaboration and better patient outcomes. |
Zawada et al21,43,50/2009 | Published | Quantitative survey | Physicians, nurse, telephysicians (n = NR) | Post | • Ten of 11 community hospitals responded. |
• Using a five-point scale, 90% of hospital administrators and lead clinical staff agreed that tele-ICU improved patient care, was easy to use, and should be available to every small or critical access hospital. | |||||
• More than 90% of telephysicians indicated that the TICU improved critical care in tertiary and community ICUs. | |||||
• All of them agreed better, safer care can be delivered by a telecritical care team. |
eICU = electronic ICU; IT = information technology; NR = not reported; TICU = tele-ICU.