Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 3.
Published in final edited form as: Radiat Res. 2008 Dec;170(6):698–710. doi: 10.1667/RR1403.1

TABLE 5.

Methods of Dose Assessment that were Considered in the Feasibility Study but Not Approved for Routine Dose Reconstruction

Method Source of information/
type of sample
Sensitivity
threshold
Applicability Reason for rejection
Analytical Dose Reconstruction (ADR) Interrogation after exposure, witness confirmation No threshold Not universal Applicable only for highly skilled ChNPP employees, tends to overestimate actual dose
Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) dosimetry with teeth Teeth extracted for medical reasons 50 mGy Not universal Applicable only for tooth donors; useful dose range only partially matches liquidators' dose range
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) Blood samples 250–300 mGy Universal for living subjects Useful dose range does not match the dose range for most liquidators
Soft Expert Assessment Dosimetry (SEAD) Interview No threshold Universal Conceptually non-trivial, bad results of testing for some categories of liquidators