Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Paediatr Child Health. 2010 Oct 26;47(1-2):27–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2010.01886.x

Table 4.

Correlations of the ThQLHC scales with self-rated disease severity, care giver rating of child’s overall quality of life, clinical parameters and indicators of socio-economic status

Self-rated
disease
severity
(P-value)
Care giver rating
of child’s overall
quality of life
(P-value)
Disability
days
CD4
cells
CD4% Log
VL
CDC clinical
classification
Household
income
Care giver’s
years of
education
Physical functioning −0.211 ** 0.115 −0.104 0.109 0.217 ** −0.047 −0.088 0.009 −0.108
Emotional functioning −0.224 ** 0.068 −0.081 0.055 0.100 −0.105 −0.121 −0.046 −0.004
Social functioning −0.174 ** 0.092 −0.115 −0.062 0.005 −0.106 −0.042 −0.076 −0.053
School functioning −0.296 ** 0.148 * −0.093 0.073 0.116 −0.150 * −0.042 −0.057 −0.073
HIV-targeted scale −0.297 ** 0.157 ** −0.047 0.057 0.120 * −0.172 ** −0.038 −0.083 −0.039
Total score −0.297 ** 0.157 ** −0.047 0.057 0.120 * −0.172 ** −0.103 −0.083 −0.039
*

Correlation is significant at P < 0.05;

**

P < 0.01.

Spearman rank correlation coefficient.

Pearson correlation coefficient. CD, cluster of differentiation; CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; ThQLHC, Thai Quality of Life for HIV-infected Children; VL, viral load. Statistically significant values are in bold.