. 2011 Feb 3;6(2):e16618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016618

Table 5. Confound Free Age Contrasts: Vigilance with Non-Focal Cues.

1^st Author & Year	Exp.	Condition	n_y	n_o	M_y	M_o	Notes
D'Ydewalle '01 [72]	1	low complexity^*	12	12	0.62	0.17
D'Ydewalle '01 [72]	1	high complexity^*	12	12	0.70	0.73
D'Ydewalle '99 [64]	1	faces^*	30	30	0.92	0.73
Einstein '95 [65]	2	general cue^*	12	12	0.56	0.47
Kidder '97 [73]	1	WM 2/ProM 1^*	15	15	0.98	0.98
Kidder '97 [73]	1	WM 3/ProM 1^*	15	15	0.82	0.69
Kidder '97 [73]	1	WM 2/ProM 3^*	15	15	0.97	0.85
Kidder '97 [73]	1	WM 3/ProM 3^*	15	15	0.90	0.63
Kliegel'06 [74]	1	low WM load/cue 1^*	27	31	0.89	0.72
Kliegel'06 [74]	1	low WM load/cue 2	27	31	0.96	0.80
Kliegel'06 [74]	1	low WM load/cue 3	27	31	0.89	0.80
Kliegel'06 [74]	1	low WM load/cue 4	27	31	0.93	0.84
Kliegel'06 [74]	1	high WM load/cue1^*	27	31	0.85	0.56
Kliegel'06 [74]	1	high WM load/cue 2	27	31	0.74	0.60
Kliegel'06 [74]	1	high WM load/cue 3	27	31	0.85	0.64
Kliegel'06 [74]	1	high WM load/cue 4	27	31	0.85	0.68
Mantyla '93 [75]	1	typical/primed	16	16	0.86	0.75
Mantyla '93 [75]	1	typical/nonprime^*	16	16	0.80	0.49
Mantyla '93 [75]	1	atypical/primed	16	16	0.80	0.30
Mantyla '93 [75]	1	atypical/nonprime	16	16	0.48	0.22
Mantyla '94 [76]	1	typical^*	18	18	0.79	0.65
Mantyla '94 [76]	1	atypical	18	18	0.65	0.26
Maylor '93 [77]	1	block 1^*	43	43	0.69	0.68
Maylor '93 [77]	1	block 2	43	43	0.83	0.66
Maylor '93 [77]	1	block 3	43	43	0.87	0.69
Maylor '93 [77]	1	block 4	43	43	0.92	0.71
Maylor '96 [39]	1	block 1^*	56	59	0.57	0.26
Maylor '96 [39]	1	block 2	56	59	0.65	0.25
Maylor '96 [39]	1	block 3	56	59	0.67	0.27
Maylor '96 [39]	1	block 4	56	59	0.60	0.28
Maylor '98 [78]	1	block 1^*	45	59	0.65	0.26
Maylor '98 [78]	1	block 2	45	59	0.75	0.25
Maylor '98 [78]	1	block 3	45	59	0.81	0.26
Maylor '98 [78]	1	block 4	45	59	0.84	0.28

Note. Means limited by severe ceiling effects are printed in bold;

*identifies independent age contrasts (see Methods).