Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 4.
Published in final edited form as: Sci Transl Med. 2010 May 5;2(30):30ra32. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000544

Table 3.

Best-fit parameter values obtained from comparisons of model predictions Eq. (S1) in (14)] with data from patients treated with telaprevir plus PEG-IFN-α-2a for two weeks.

Patient ρT (day-1) δ (day-1)
εtotals
εtotalr
β (10-8 mL day-1 virion-1) ps (virions cell-1 day-1) Infected cells at baseline* (%) Increase in total hepatocytes (%)
1001 0.83 0.93 0.99951 0.68 4.77 80.07 5.4 49
1005 0.31 0.29 0.99832 0.82 7.27 5.90 4.2 8
3007 1.12 0.33 0.99984 0.77 8.34 18.47 14 40
3009 1.76 0.55 0.99980 0.95 0.57 132.52 8.3 8
3011 0.92 0.18 0.99810 0.91 0.76 38.36 12 7
3013 2.20 0.51 0.99950 0.95 1.27 52.17 8.0 5
3016 1.24 0.46 0.99961 0.70 9.63 13.31 13 28
3019 1.65 0.44 0.99937 0.78 11.29 20.57 15 43
Average±SD 1.25±0.60 0. 46±0.23 0.99930±0.00067 0.82±0.11 5.49±4.26 45.17±42.79 10±4.1 24±19
*

We assumed that half the maximum number of hepatocytes are not targets of HCV infection during data fitting. Similar sensitivity analysis of data fitting to the choice of N was addressed in the remarks of Table 2.