Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Auris Nasus Larynx. 2010 Oct 28;38(3):367–372. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2010.09.006

Table 2.

Results of one-way ANOVA for the parametric curve-fitting coefficients a and b, and post-hoc Tukey tests for pairwise comparisons of the coefficient a for elastic shear modulus (G’) and dynamic viscosity (η’) among the canine vocal fold cover (n = 16), canine vocalis muscle (n = 6), and the human vocal fold cover [16] (n = 7).

Viscoelastic function Parametric coefficient F (2, 26) p value
G’ a 9.200 < 0.001
b 0.719 0.497
η’ a 41.876 < 0.001
b 3.093 0.063
Pairwise comparisons for G’ (coefficient a) p value Pairwise comparisons for η’ (coefficient a) p value
Canine muscle vs. human cover 0.002 Canine muscle vs. human cover < 0.001
Canine muscle vs. canine cover 0.002 Canine muscle vs. canine cover < 0.001
Canine cover vs. human cover 0.845 Canine cover vs. human cover 0.010