Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Sep 29;108(3):436–452. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.008

Table 5.

Tests of measurement invariance of the unitary EF model for groups of children defined by sex (top panel) and sociodemographic risk status (bottom panel)

Model χ2 df p RMSEA CFI BIC χ2 difference Df p
Sex Invariance
Baseline 29.95 28 .37 0.03 0.98 5165.15 -- -- --
Metric Invariance 35.30 34 .41 0.02 0.99 5137.93 5.35 6 .50
Scalar Invariance 46.68 40 .22 0.04 0.94 5116.73 11.38 6 .08
Equal Error Variances 51.43 47 .30 0.03 0.96 5083.47 4.75 7 .69
Equal Factor Variances 52.00 48 .32 0.03 0.97 5078.62 0.57 1 .45
Equal Factor Means 52.83 49 .33 0.03 0.97 5074.01 0.83 1 .36

Sociodemographic Risk Status Invariance
Baseline 26.05 28 .57 0.00 1.00 5107.31 -- -- --
Metric Invariance 34.88 34 .43 0.02 0.99 5083.56 8.83 6 .18
Scalar Invariance 41.25 40 0.42 0.02 0.99 5057.369 6.37 6 .38
Equal Error Variances 73.80 47 0.01 0.07 0.71 5051.90 32.55 7 <.0001
Partial Error Variancesa 47.48 45 0.37 0.02 0.97 5036.44 6.23 5 .28
Equal Factor Variancesa 57.36 46 0.12 0.05 0.88 5040.89 9.88 1 .002
Equal Factor Meansa 79.55 47 0.002 0.08 0.65 5057.65 22.19 1 < .0001
a

Nebraska Barnyard and Go/No-go error variances permitted to differ between low-risk and at-risk groups